Apache HBase Reviews

Ganeti Reviews

Apache HBase mentions (6)

• How to choose the right type of database

  HBase and Cassandra: Both cater to non-structured Big Data. Cassandra is geared towards scenarios requiring high availability with eventual consistency, while HBase offers strong consistency and is better suited for read-heavy applications where data consistency is paramount. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• When to Use a NoSQL Database

  NoSQL databases are non-relational databases with flexible schema designed for high performance at a massive scale. Unlike traditional relational databases, which use tables and predefined schemas, NoSQL databases use a variety of data models. There are 4 main types of NoSQL databases - document, graph, key-value, and column-oriented databases. NoSQL databases generally are well-suited for unstructured data,... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

• In One Minute : Hadoop

  HBase, A scalable, distributed database that supports structured data storage for large tables. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• What’s the Database Plus concept and what challenges can it solve?

  Today, it is normal for enterprises to leverage diversified databases. In my market of expertise, China, in the Internet industry, MySQL together with data sharding middleware is the go to architecture, with GreenPlum, HBase, Elasticsearch, Clickhouse and other big data ecosystems being auxiliary computing engine for analytical data. At the same time, some legacy systems (such as SQLServer legacy from .NET... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Fully featured Repository Pattern with Typescript and native PostgreSQL driver

  For this type of systems PostgreSQL not best solution, and for a number of reasons like lack of replication out of the box. And we strictly must not have «Vendor lock», and therefore also did not take modern SQL databases like Amazon Aurora. And end of the ends the choice was made in favor Cassandra, for this article where we will talking about low-lever implementation of Repository Pattern it is not important, in... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

Ganeti mentions (15)

• Order/license chaos for VMware products after Broadcom takeover

  We use ganeti and I'm ridiculously happy with it. When I came on board we were using ganeti for dev/stg and VMWare for production. But the difficulty of monitoring VMWare (we were moving away from SAN to local storage, and doing a RAID array monitor was a PITA) and administering (via Windows GUI, which I had to run via a VM on my Linux workstations), plus the licensing weirdness (clusters of size 5 were a sweet... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• VMware is now part of Broadcom

  Yep, happily using https://ganeti.org/ and KVM live migrations - mirrors across hosts. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Learning more about KVM, oVirt or stick to Proxmox?

  It's more focused on clusters, but you could check out Ganeti. Source: 11 months ago

• Proxmox, CEPH and kubernetes

  I've been using CEPH as a backend for Ganeti storage for a long time. It's not as complex as some people like to make it out to be. But just like an distributed redundant storage, you really want to have networking that has closer to the bandwidth of your storage devices in order to make it feel like local storage speeds. Usually means 10Gbe or better. Source: about 1 year ago

• Virtualization without shared storage

  Try Ganeti. It can build VM clusters using DRBD or Ceph (or both at the same time if you want). It takes the pain out of managing DRBD. Source: over 1 year ago