Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Anyfiddle VS Pijul

Compare Anyfiddle VS Pijul and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Anyfiddle logo Anyfiddle

Build, run and share code in any language from your browser

Pijul logo Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source distributed version control system based on a sound theory of...
  • Anyfiddle Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-10
  • Pijul Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

Anyfiddle features and specs

  • Convenience
    Anyfiddle allows users to run and share code snippets from multiple languages without the need to set up an environment locally, which simplifies the process of testing and demonstrating code.
  • Collaboration
    The platform facilitates real-time collaboration by enabling multiple users to edit and run code simultaneously, making it useful for pair programming and remote team interactions.
  • Cross-language support
    It supports a variety of programming languages, giving developers flexibility to switch and work with different languages in a single platform.
  • Access from Anywhere
    Being an online tool, Anyfiddle can be accessed from any device with internet connectivity, providing great flexibility for remote or mobile work.

Possible disadvantages of Anyfiddle

  • Performance Limitations
    Running code in a browser-based environment might have performance limitations compared to a fully equipped local development setup, which can impact the efficiency of running heavier or more complex tasks.
  • Limited Customization
    The coding environment might have limited customization options compared to local editors or IDEs, potentially affecting developer productivity if they can't configure the tool to their liking.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies might be more challenging in an online environment, particularly for projects requiring complex setup or specific versions of libraries.
  • Privacy and Security
    Sharing code and executing it in a cloud environment can raise concerns about privacy and data security, especially for proprietary or sensitive codebases.

Pijul features and specs

  • Patch-Based System
    Pijul is based on a true patch-based model, where changes are stored as patches. This allows for more granular control and the ability to handle conflicts more naturally than in traditional version control systems.
  • Commute-ability
    Pijul allows patches to commute, meaning they can be rearranged freely as long as they do not directly conflict with each other. This can make collaboration simpler as developers can work in parallel seamlessly.
  • Conflict Resolution
    The system offers more sophisticated conflict resolution mechanisms, enabling users to resolve conflicts at the patch level rather than entire commits, making it easier to pinpoint and address issues.
  • Mathematical Foundations
    Pijul is based on a strong theoretical foundation (Darcs theory) that provides a rigorous mathematical framework for version control logic, offering a structured and reliable approach to merging and branching.
  • Branching and Merging
    Branching and merging in Pijul are straightforward and intuitive, eliminating many of the complexities associated with these processes in other systems.

Possible disadvantages of Pijul

  • Maturity and Adoption
    As a relatively new system, Pijul may not be as mature as other VCS solutions like Git, possibly leading to a lack of community support, plugins, and resources.
  • Tooling
    The ecosystem around Pijul, including integrations with other tools like IDEs and CI/CD systems, is still in development, potentially complicating its use in professional environments.
  • Learning Curve
    The patch-based approach and the principles behind Pijul might be unfamiliar to users accustomed to traditional version control systems, resulting in a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance
    For very large repositories or numerous patches, performance could potentially be an issue due to the complexity of operations on patches, though active improvements are being made.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    The community and ecosystem around Pijul are smaller compared to more established version control systems, which may hinder the availability of guides, plug-ins, or extensions.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Anyfiddle and Pijul)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Anyfiddle and Pijul. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pijul seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 48 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Anyfiddle mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Anyfiddle yet. Tracking of Anyfiddle recommendations started around Aug 2021.

Pijul mentions (48)

  • Evo: Version control that works the way you think
    Obligatory link to https://pijul.org/ which I’d say also fits the description - in which you really commit patches instead of whole trees and patches are pretend. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • I'm daily driving Jujutsu, and maybe you should too
    Simplicity is in the eye of the beholder but Pijul[0] claims to be "easy to learn and use". [0] https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: If you were rewriting Emacs from scratch, what would you do differently?
    >> see jujutsu nowadays I'm looking at pijul.. https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Jujutsu: A Next Generation Replacement for Git
    How does this compare to Pijul[1]? [1] https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Local First, Forever
    Using theory of patches would better compliment the current approach. Integrating a scm such as https://pijul.org or atleast the underlying tech would allow for better conflict resolutions. Transferring patches should also allow for more efficient use of io. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Anyfiddle and Pijul, you can also consider the following products

thiscodeWorks - Save and share code that works

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

codepad - Very simple webpage with a simple textbox, a checkbox for selecting one of several languages and an...

darcs - Darcs is an advanced revision control system, for source code or other files.

CodeMyUI - Handpicked code snippets you can use in your web projects

Gitless - Gitless is an experimental version control system built on top of Git.