Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Anvil.works VS Xamarin.Android

Compare Anvil.works VS Xamarin.Android and see what are their differences

Anvil.works logo Anvil.works

Build seriously powerful web apps with all the flexibility of Python. No web development experience required.

Xamarin.Android logo Xamarin.Android

Integrated environment for building not only native Android but iOS and Windows apps too.
  • Anvil.works Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-23

Anvil is a powerful online platform that lets you build web applications with nothing but Python. It comes with two-click deployment, built-in user authentication, easy-to-use databases and loads more!

Learn all about Anvil in 80 seconds: https://youtu.be/3V-3g1mQ5GY

  • Xamarin.Android Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06

Anvil.works features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Anvil.works simplifies web development through its drag-and-drop interface and Python-based backend, making it accessible for developers who may not have extensive front-end skills.
  • Integrated Development
    It provides an all-in-one platform, including database management, authentication, and server-side logic, which reduces the need for multiple third-party services.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The platform allows for quick iteration and development of prototypes, enabling faster testing and validation of ideas.
  • Python Support
    For developers familiar with Python, Anvil.works allows them to leverage their existing knowledge without having to learn JavaScript, HTML, or CSS.
  • Deployment Simplicity
    Deploying an application is straightforward and seamless, as it removes much of the overhead involved in traditional web app deployment.

Possible disadvantages of Anvil.works

  • Limited Flexibility
    Because it's an all-in-one solution, customization might be limited compared to traditional development stacks where you have complete control over all layers of the application.
  • Performance Constraints
    Applications built on Anvil.works might not be as performant as those built with more specialized frameworks or stacks, particularly for very large or complex applications.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Reliance on Anvil.works means that your application is dependent on their platform. Migrating away can be challenging if their pricing model changes or if the service discontinues.
  • Learning Curve
    While it reduces the need to learn multiple web technologies, there is still a learning curve for mastering the Anvil-specific ways of doing things.
  • Cost
    While there is a free tier, advanced features and higher tiers can become costly, particularly if the platform scales with usage.

Xamarin.Android features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Development
    Xamarin.Android allows developers to write for multiple platforms using a single codebase, facilitating code reuse and reducing development time and costs.
  • Native Performance
    Applications built with Xamarin.Android can achieve near-native performance levels, leveraging platform-specific APIs and hardware capabilities.
  • Shared Codebase
    Developers can share a large portion of their code across different platforms (i.e., Android, iOS, Windows), simplifying maintenance and updates.
  • Access to .NET Libraries
    Xamarin.Android enables the use of the extensive .NET ecosystem and libraries, providing a robust and well-supported development environment.
  • Strong Integration with Visual Studio
    Xamarin offers seamless integration with Visual Studio, allowing developers to use familiar tools and workflows to debug, test, and deploy their applications.

Possible disadvantages of Xamarin.Android

  • Overhead and Package Size
    Xamarin.Android applications can have larger package sizes and extra overhead compared to natively developed applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers coming from a purely native Android development background (Java/Kotlin) may face a steep learning curve when transitioning to C# and the Xamarin framework.
  • Limited Access to Latest Features
    Sometimes there may be delays in gaining access to the latest Android features and updates, as Xamarin bindings need to be updated to support them.
  • Performance Overheads
    While near-native performance is achievable, there may be some performance overheads especially with complex applications requiring extensive platform-specific optimizations.
  • Community and Support
    Although Xamarin has a dedicated community, it is smaller compared to native Android development communities, which may result in fewer resources and less community support.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Anvil.works and Xamarin.Android)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Anvil.works and Xamarin.Android. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Anvil.works seems to be a lot more popular than Xamarin.Android. While we know about 97 links to Anvil.works, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Xamarin.Android. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Anvil.works mentions (97)

  • Delphi Is 30
    I've often compared Anvil (it's web-IDE for web-apps in Python https://anvil.works) to Delphi. I'm curious how you'd rate it on those qualities (off the bat it ticks a lot of those boxes. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Everything I built with Claude Artifacts this week
    I am a bit frustrated that I don't have a great "tool" environment to build out this stuff, because of having to futz with the I/O. Like most of that stuff is "well I know how to write the Python to do the last step, but wrapping it all up in a simple web UI is Too Much Work". That effort might be small, but it's still orders of magnitude larger than the snippet! Lots of TUI interfaces try to approximate this, but... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (July 2024)
    Anvil (https://anvil.works) | Developer Advocate | Cambridge, UK | ONSITE, VISA | Full-time/part-time/flexible We make an open-source web framework, an online code editor, a GUI builder, and a PaaS hosting platform. Together, you can build and host a full-stack web application - and all you need is a little Python. (Yes, even the client-side code - we compile Python to JS and provide a GUI framework!) We’re... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    Anvil.works - Web app development with nothing but Python. Free tier with unlimited apps and 30-second timeouts. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (February 2024)
    Anvil (https://anvil.works) | Senior Developer | Cambridge, UK | ONSITE, VISA | Full-time/part-time/flexible We make an open-source web framework, an online code editor, a GUI builder, and a PaaS hosting platform. Together, you can build and host a full-stack web application - and all you need is a little Python. (Yes, even the client-side code - we compile Python to JS and provide our own GUI framework!) We’re... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Xamarin.Android mentions (6)

  • Why is Android Development so difficult/complex? (compared to Web and Desktop)
    Take a look at https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/apps/mobile. It will allow you to write Android apps in C# in Visual Studio. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Stop EU Chat Control
    > It's not hardware. So now are kernel extensions also “applications”? > VSCode is an app that needs the .NET runtime, in order to run the code you write in e.g. C#. You could not possibly be more wrong. VSCode is written in Typescript. It is an Electron app. There have been cross platform JS frameworks that ran on iOS for a decade. Besides that, it’s been years since you have needed the .Net runtime to run... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • this sub in a nutshell
    Ah, so C# (and .NET) does have its answer to Qt, point taken. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Which programming language to learn next (as a competitive programer before college)?
    C# can be used for mobile and macOS - https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/apps/xamarin/mobile-apps. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How good is .Net Core for iOS apps?
    Iric that’s only possible with Microsoft Xamarin. Never used it, rarely hear about it. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Anvil.works and Xamarin.Android, you can also consider the following products

Unity - The multiplatform game creation tools for everyone.

RAD Studio - RAD Studio 10.2 with Delphi Linux compiler is the fastest way to write, compile, package and deploy cross-platform native software applications. Learn more.

Blender - Blender is the open source, cross platform suite of tools for 3D creation.

Rider - Rider is a cross-platform .NET IDE based on the IntelliJ platform and ReSharper.

Unreal Engine - Unreal Engine 4 is a suite of integrated tools for game developers to design and build games, simulations, and visualizations.

Qt Creator - Qt Creator is a cross-platform C++, JavaScript and QML integrated development environment. It is the fastest, easiest and most fun experience a C++ developer could wish for.