Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Animate.css VS Move.js

Compare Animate.css VS Move.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Move.js logo Move.js

Move.js is a mini Javascript library that provides CSS3 animations.
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06
  • Move.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-15

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Move.js features and specs

  • Simple API
    Move.js provides a straightforward and easy-to-use API that allows developers to create animations with minimal code and effort.
  • Lightweight
    The library is small in size, making it ideal for use in projects where performance and load times are critical.
  • CSS3 Support
    Move.js leverages CSS3 transitions, offering smooth and hardware-accelerated animations.
  • Chainable Methods
    The library supports method chaining, enabling developers to write more readable and concise animation sequences.

Possible disadvantages of Move.js

  • Limited Functionality
    Move.js focuses primarily on basic animations, which might not be sufficient for complex animation requirements.
  • Development Inactivity
    The library has not been actively maintained for a while, which may lead to compatibility issues with modern browsers and frameworks.
  • No Built-in Easing Functions
    Move.js relies on CSS transitions for easing functions, offering less flexibility compared to libraries with custom easing options.
  • Dependence on CSS3 Support
    Older browsers that do not fully support CSS3 transitions may not render animations correctly.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Animate.css and Move.js)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Animate.css and Move.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Animate.css seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

Move.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Move.js yet. Tracking of Move.js recommendations started around Jul 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Animate.css and Move.js, you can also consider the following products

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Animo.js - Animo.js is a lightweight, open-source tool that enables developers to manipulate animations and transitions.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Magic Animations CSS3 - CSS3 Animations with special effects.

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Stylie - Stylie is an open-source, easy-to-use tool based on Rekapi that allows you to build complex web animations in a short time.