Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Animate.css VS Flexbox Grid

Compare Animate.css VS Flexbox Grid and see what are their differences

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Flexbox Grid logo Flexbox Grid

Grid based on CSS3 flexbox
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06
  • Flexbox Grid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Flexbox Grid features and specs

  • Responsive Design
    Flexbox Grid is designed to create complex layouts that adapt seamlessly to different screen sizes, facilitating responsive web design.
  • Simplified Alignment
    The use of Flexbox makes it easier to align and distribute space among items in a container without using floats or positioning.
  • Consistency
    Flexbox Grid provides a consistent layout structure, making it easier to maintain and scale web projects without layout issues.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Flexbox is supported by most modern browsers, ensuring that Flexbox Grid layouts work across various platforms.
  • Flexible Layouts
    Flexbox Grid allows for flexible and dynamic grid layouts that can be easily adjusted with CSS properties.

Possible disadvantages of Flexbox Grid

  • Learning Curve
    Flexbox Grid requires understanding Flexbox principles, which can be challenging for beginners who are not familiar with CSS Flexbox.
  • Limited Older Browser Support
    Older browsers may not fully support Flexbox properties, potentially creating issues in layout rendering.
  • Performance Overhead
    Using a grid framework can introduce additional performance overhead compared to custom CSS solutions tailored to specific needs.
  • Dependency
    Relying on a grid system like Flexbox Grid means adding a dependency to your project, possibly increasing maintenance concerns.

Analysis of Animate.css

Overall verdict

  • Animate.css is generally considered a good tool for adding animations to web projects. It is reliable, simple to use, and widely supported by the development community. However, for highly customized animations or when trying to minimize the performance footprint, custom solutions may be more appropriate.

Why this product is good

  • Animate.css is a well-known library for CSS animations. It is widely used due to its ease of integration, comprehensive collection of animations, and minimal overhead. It allows developers to quickly incorporate animations into their projects without having to write complex CSS from scratch.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking for quick, easy-to-use animation solutions.
  • Projects that need standard animations with minimal setup.
  • Developers who prefer using established libraries with active community support.
  • Designers who want to add basic animations without deep CSS knowledge.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Animate.css and Flexbox Grid)
Design Tools
80 80%
20% 20
CSS Framework
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Website Builder
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Animate.css and Flexbox Grid. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Animate.css and Flexbox Grid

Animate.css Reviews

We have no reviews of Animate.css yet.
Be the first one to post

Flexbox Grid Reviews

Top 5 Bootstrap Alternatives
The Flexbox Grid, as the name suggests, is a grid system based on the CSS Flexbox properties. However, unlike the CSS technique, all the complexity is nicely abstracted away so that you focus only on placing elements the way you want. The best part is that all the code and class names mimic what you’d want in Bootstrap 4, which means switching between these two tools...
Source: geekflare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flexbox Grid should be more popular than Animate.css. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

Flexbox Grid mentions (7)

  • I'm currently in the interview process for a Jr. Full Stack Developer position, and I was given this take-home test that has me on the verge of pulling my hair out.
    Not that everyone is the same but here's what I would do. 1) Start with how the data is organized by using Postman to fetch the JSON because they will give me an idea of the kind of data and how I should interact 2) Then proceed to the things I don't know well. In my case, Tabindexes: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Global_attributes/tabindex Aria-labels:... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why is tailwind so hyped?
    May you provide a specific scenario? A decade old 960gs provide a custom grid that could be easily tuned to any "proportion of the screen". Random super minimalistic http://flexboxgrid.com/ from the 10 seconds google search had a flex-basis param that could tune grid on the fly. Every other modern "flex css grid framework" has mediaqueries and basic components slapped on top. Barebones grid and flexbox provide... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Tailwind is now the most popular CSS framework in NPM
    Here is a great CSS library that is just the column system. http://flexboxgrid.com/ It has the same naming as bootstrap. I personally just use flex and grid since it so powerful I have no need for a grid system. I just use grid template columns and then flex for pretty much everything else. Tis is why I love Tailwind CSS. It so much more powerful it has all the break points for you and then just lets you get to... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Massive use of div containers in Yelp.com: is that really necessary?
    If it helps this is my go-to flex grid system when I start a new project. I usually build the big blocks using the utility classes provided by flexboxgrid (which is percentage-based), and then go in each component and fine tune each one. I also extended it a little bit to cover some uses cases that I felt it missed. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to use this bootstrap grid alternative?
    Did you check out it's documentation? http://flexboxgrid.com/. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Animate.css and Flexbox Grid, you can also consider the following products

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

FlexboxPatterns - Build awesome user interfaces with CSS flexbox

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Simple Grid - Responsive & lightweight CSS grid for your website.

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Lucas Gruwez - 🏊 + ⛵️ + 👨‍💻 | 🇦🇺 ↔️ 🇧🇪