Software Alternatives & Reviews

Ampersand.js VS Fusion.js

Compare Ampersand.js VS Fusion.js and see what are their differences

Ampersand.js logo Ampersand.js

A highly modular, loosely coupled, non-frameworky framework for building advanced JavaScript apps

Fusion.js logo Fusion.js

A modular Javascript framework for creating plugin-based React applications.
  • Ampersand.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-29
  • Fusion.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-21

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ampersand.js and Fusion.js)
Javascript UI Libraries
61 61%
39% 39
Application And Data
0 0%
100% 100
JS Library
58 58%
42% 42
JavaScript Framework
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Ampersand.js and Fusion.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Fusion.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ampersand.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Ampersand.js yet. Tracking of Ampersand.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Fusion.js mentions (3)

  • [AskJS] question about your monorepo workflow
    b) Don't do intermediate builds at all. This is what we do for monorepo-internal packages at Uber. Basically, our framework lets you specify what parts of node_modules should be transpiled when compiling the service. So basically you just have a single compilation step and the performance cost is alleviated by leveraging babel cache. The upside of this approach is you only need one file watching daemon and you... Source: over 2 years ago
  • [AskJS] Best practices for polyfills in libraries?
    I also worked on another framework which does ship with polyfills, but this one is very much a "we-call-you" framework, in the sense that it has an full-fledged, opinionated compiler with hundreds of hours worth of time spent on optimizations, and the inclusion of polyfills is also very much a deliberate choice made in the name of productivity. Source: over 2 years ago
  • [AskJS] Is it just me or is core-js fundamentally broken?
    We've gone down this rabbit hole with Fusion.js. The TL;DR: is core.js aims to be standard-compliant, which means it'll often pull in a lot of code to deal with obscure corner cases like dealing w/ Symbols. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ampersand.js and Fusion.js, you can also consider the following products

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Browse Happy - Presents the user with a list of the most popular modern browsers with links to download the latest version of each.

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Backbone.js - Give your JS App some Backbone with Models, Views, Collections, and Events

Thymeleaf - Thymeleaf is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments.