Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Fusion.js VS Thymeleaf

Compare Fusion.js VS Thymeleaf and see what are their differences

Fusion.js logo Fusion.js

A modular Javascript framework for creating plugin-based React applications.

Thymeleaf logo Thymeleaf

Thymeleaf is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments.
  • Fusion.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-21
  • Thymeleaf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26

Fusion.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Thymeleaf features and specs

  • Natural Template Approach
    Thymeleaf allows developers to create templates that can be directly opened and edited by designers in browsers, making collaboration between developers and designers easier.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    It provides powerful templating capabilities on the server-side, allowing for dynamic content generation, which is well-suited for web applications that need to process templates on the server.
  • Spring Integration
    Thymeleaf integrates seamlessly with Spring Framework, making it an ideal choice for Spring-based web applications.
  • Rich Features
    Features such as internationalization, decoupled templates, and template inheritance make Thymeleaf a versatile tool for complex applications.
  • HTML5 Support
    Thymeleaf offers excellent support for modern HTML5 standards, ensuring compatibility and future-proofing of web applications.

Possible disadvantages of Thymeleaf

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Compared to some other templating engines, Thymeleaf has a steeper learning curve, particularly for those not familiar with XML or HTML attribute-based templates.
  • Less Suitable for Highly Interactive UIs
    Since Thymeleaf is a server-side technology, it might not be the best choice for applications requiring highly interactive and dynamically updated UI, which are better served by client-side solutions like React or Angular.
  • Performance Overhead
    The server-side processing of Thymeleaf templates can introduce performance overhead, particularly for large-scale applications with high traffic volumes.
  • Limited Reusability
    Unlike component-based libraries or frameworks, Thymeleaf may have limited reusability of UI components, which can lead to more code duplication.

Fusion.js videos

No Fusion.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Thymeleaf videos

Spring Boot Thymeleaf Form Handling Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - Using Thymeleaf in Spring Boot
  • Review - 4.4 Thymeleaf Standard Dialect XSD

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fusion.js and Thymeleaf)
Application And Data
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
17 17%
83% 83
JS Library
25 25%
75% 75
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fusion.js and Thymeleaf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Fusion.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fusion.js mentions (4)

  • Scientists Develop Artificial Leaf, Uses Sunlight to Produce Valuable Chemicals
    Clearly that's what they meant when they said fusion: https://fusionjs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • [AskJS] question about your monorepo workflow
    b) Don't do intermediate builds at all. This is what we do for monorepo-internal packages at Uber. Basically, our framework lets you specify what parts of node_modules should be transpiled when compiling the service. So basically you just have a single compilation step and the performance cost is alleviated by leveraging babel cache. The upside of this approach is you only need one file watching daemon and you... Source: over 3 years ago
  • [AskJS] Best practices for polyfills in libraries?
    I also worked on another framework which does ship with polyfills, but this one is very much a "we-call-you" framework, in the sense that it has an full-fledged, opinionated compiler with hundreds of hours worth of time spent on optimizations, and the inclusion of polyfills is also very much a deliberate choice made in the name of productivity. Source: over 3 years ago
  • [AskJS] Is it just me or is core-js fundamentally broken?
    We've gone down this rabbit hole with Fusion.js. The TL;DR: is core.js aims to be standard-compliant, which means it'll often pull in a lot of code to deal with obscure corner cases like dealing w/ Symbols. Source: about 4 years ago

Thymeleaf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Thymeleaf yet. Tracking of Thymeleaf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fusion.js and Thymeleaf, you can also consider the following products

Browse Happy - Presents the user with a list of the most popular modern browsers with links to download the latest version of each.

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Polymer - Polymer is a library that uses the latest web technologies to let you create custom HTML elements.

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

Kissflow - Kissflow is a workflow tool & business process workflow management software to automate your workflow process. Rated #1 cloud workflow software in Google Apps Marketplace.