Based on our record, Jekyll should be more popular than Amazon Lightsail. It has been mentiond 180 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Https://aws.amazon.com/lightsail/?nc1=h_ls. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
AWS Lightsail 🏆 Amazon's affordable VPS hosting service, starting at $3.50/month. Explore more: AWS Lightsail. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
LightSail is decent: https://aws.amazon.com/lightsail. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Even if it's part of the gargantuan mess that's AWS with its 200 interconnected services, AWS Lightsail is actually very intuitive and fairly priced. There's a super basic $5/month VPS, even though .NET is hungry and you'll likely want the $10 one for some extra RAM. You can easily install whatever database you like on the same instance the application is running on. Source: 11 months ago
Lightsail includes everything you need to launch your project quickly – virtual machines, containers, databases, CDN, load balancers, DNS management etc. This is especially good if you just need to get started quickly and have a good jump off point seeing as Amazon Lightsail is the easiest way to get started with Amazon Web Services (AWS) if you just need virtual private servers. Lightsail includes everything you... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Microsoft Azure - Windows Azure and SQL Azure enable you to build, host and scale applications in Microsoft datacenters.
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.
WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.
Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.Sign up to Linode through SaaSHub and get a $100 in credit!
Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.