Amazon Glacier Reviews

Mac Backup Guru Reviews

1. David Brook

   over 3 years ago
   Very poor

   Buggy as hell and the seller ignores all emails. Promising but for all practical purposes, useless for protecting my data. Maybe in a year or two if he shows more interest

   👍 Pros:    Nice interface, shows promise but too unreliable for me.

   👎 Cons:    Very buggy in important respects.

Amazon Glacier mentions (28)

• Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive

  Do you think that Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive is good for digital preservation of my ~300GB video stash? Source: 11 months ago

• Looking for recommendations for a long term, secure, off-site data storage solution

  Easy - I know about S3 Glaciers but I'd prefer something that doesn't require going through a number of tutorials to use. Source: about 1 year ago

• Is it possible to have cloud ssd and hdd, instead of physic ones?

  The nice thing about AWS is that you could use Amazon S3 Glacier storage if you can live with slower retrieval (5-12 hours). It's really cheap and excellent for non-changing requirements which would be good for media that isn't updating regularly. https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. Source: about 1 year ago

• How many backups of photos should I have? And where?

  I would recommend Amazon S3 Glacier https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ . You can explicitly upload files there via web interface or many 3rd party clients. You can also upload to more than one geographical location. Source: over 1 year ago

• Best place to upload / store 35-50GB daily online?

  What you want, is Amazon Glacier. You're not talking about Backup here, you're talking about Archival. Source: over 1 year ago

Mac Backup Guru mentions (0)