Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Amazon Elastic Transcoder VS Flussonic

Compare Amazon Elastic Transcoder VS Flussonic and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Amazon Elastic Transcoder logo Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Amazon Elastic Transcoder is media transcoding in the cloud.

Flussonic logo Flussonic

We develop software for streaming video since 2010. Flussonic server solutions help business clients store, capture, deliver and transcode video. Customers in more than 100 countries.
  • Amazon Elastic Transcoder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-02
  • Flussonic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-05

Amazon Elastic Transcoder features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon Elastic Transcoder automatically scales to handle the volume of media files you need to process, accommodating fluctuating workloads without manual intervention.
  • Integration with AWS
    As an AWS service, Elastic Transcoder integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3 for storage and CloudFront for distribution, enhancing workflow efficiency.
  • Predefined Presets
    It offers a range of predefined presets that simplify the process of transcoding media into the desired formats for different devices and resolutions.
  • Pay-as-you-go Pricing
    Elastic Transcoder employs a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to only pay for what they use without upfront commitments.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon Elastic Transcoder

  • Complex Initial Setup
    Setting up Elastic Transcoder can be complex for users unfamiliar with AWS services, requiring an understanding of IAM roles, buckets, and other AWS concepts.
  • Pricing Complexity
    Although it offers a pay-as-you-go model, understanding the pricing structure in detail can be complicated, particularly when estimating costs for large-scale operations.
  • Performance Limitations
    For very high volume or extremely demanding media processing tasks, Elastic Transcoder might not offer the speed or customization that specialized solutions or on-premises systems can provide.
  • Limited Customization
    While Elastic Transcoder supports presets for convenience, there might be limited customization options compared to using dedicated, on-premise media processing software.

Flussonic features and specs

  • Scalability
    Flussonic provides robust scalability options that can support a large number of concurrent streams, making it appropriate for businesses that plan to grow their streaming service.
  • High Performance
    It offers high-performance streaming with low latency, which is crucial for live streaming events and ensuring a smooth user experience.
  • Wide Range of Supported Formats
    Flussonic supports a variety of streaming formats and codecs, which allows for flexible integration with different devices and platforms.
  • Comprehensive Feature Set
    The platform provides a comprehensive set of features, including DVR functionality, VOD support, and adaptive bitrate streaming, enhancing its utility across different use cases.
  • Advanced Security Features
    Flussonic includes sophisticated security measures like geo-blocking, token authentication, and DRM, offering strong protection for content providers.

Possible disadvantages of Flussonic

  • Complexity
    The wide range of features and configurations can make Flussonic complex to set up and manage, particularly for users without advanced technical expertise.
  • Cost
    As a premium product, Flussonic might be costly for small businesses or startups compared to some simpler or open-source alternatives.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a considerable learning curve associated with Flussonic due to its advanced capabilities and extensive documentation requirements.
  • Support Limitations
    While Flussonic offers technical support, the response times and depth of support might be insufficient for users in urgent need of assistance.
  • Resource Intensive
    Flussonic may require significant server resources to operate efficiently, which could lead to higher operational costs or the need for hardware upgrades.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder videos

+ Add

AWS Tutorial 38 - Amazon Elastic Transcoder

More videos:

  • Review - AWS Webcast - What's New with Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Flussonic videos

+ Add

WOWZA and Flussonic media servers. Explained

More videos:

  • Review - Installing Flussonic on Windows
  • Review - Installing Flussonic on VPS Cloud Server

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Amazon Elastic Transcoder and Flussonic)

Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Flussonic

Video Converter
100 100%
Video Converter
0% 0
Live Streaming
0 0%
Live Streaming
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Video
0 0%
Video
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon Elastic Transcoder and Flussonic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon Elastic Transcoder seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder mentions (7)

  • AV1 tool to auto compress old video files for archive
    Alternatively, if your Internet connection can handle it, you could upload your videos to a cloud service that processes them for you. For example, Amazon's AWS has a transcoding service called Elastic, which charges 3 cents per minute of video (half of that if it's lower than 720p). Might be worth the reduced time and effort for business use. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Converting Video Audio To A File Using AWS?
    If you're looking for an AWS specific solution, check out Amazon Elastic Transcoder. I think it'll do what you want with a pipeline and you can do it serverless. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Cloud computing noob question(s)!
    If you use https://aws.amazon.com/elastictranscoder/ then you don’t need a computer, it’s a managed service, get your files to s3 somehow and thats it. There are some other services from other providers that can do the same too, I strongly encourage to look into that, unless you have specific encoding specs that you can’t do somewhere. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Where should i compress the video
    However compressing on the server is the better option in case you want to generate gifs, thumbnails, and different sizes and formats of the video. A lot of big video streaming companies will use something like Amazons media convert. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Scaling node.js backend service (Help to choose perfect design pattern and tools)
    This is how I'd do it, but instead of using EC2 for step 5 I'd look into Elastic Transcoder. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Flussonic mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Flussonic yet. Tracking of Flussonic recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Amazon Elastic Transcoder and Flussonic, you can also consider the following products

Rendi - Rendi is a simple REST API for FFmpeg. We take care the cloud infrastructure and costs, so you don't have to.

Wowza - Streaming media server supporting all known streaming protocols.

AWS Elemental MediaConvert - AWS Elemental MediaConvert is a file-based video processing service that allows video providers to transcode content for broadcast and multiscreen delivery at scale.

Nimble Streamer - Light-weight media server that is freemium, pay for control panel if you need it.

Cloudinary - Cloudinary is a cloud-based service for hosting videos and images designed specifically with the needs of web and mobile developers in mind.

MistServer - MistServer is a lightweight, open-source multistandard multimedia server.

Loading...