Amazon AWS Reviews

1. macloughlin

   | AV engineer | 10 months ago
   The best cloud platform out there

   You could say a lot of things about AWS, but among the cloud platforms (and I've used quite a few) AWS takes the cake. It is logically structured, you can get through its documentation relatively easily, you have a great variety of tools and services to choose from [from AWS itself and from third-party developers in their marketplace]. There is a learning curve, there is quite a lot of it, but it is still way easier than some other platforms. I've used and abused AWS and EC2 specifically and for me it is the best.

   👍 Pros:    Great documentation|Website structure visualization|You have control over everything|Flexibility

   👎 Cons:    Learning curve|A lot of dashboards for different things

mozjpeg Reviews

Amazon AWS mentions (367)

• Best Hosting Options for Developers in 2024

  Amazon Web Services is a leading cloud platform offering a vast array of services, from compute and storage to machine learning and IoT. AWS is known for its scalability, handling anything from small projects to enterprise-level applications. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago

• Deploy a Static React Site Using AWS S3 and CloudFront

  In this tutorial, I will walk you through building a quick static site by doing a static build using ReactJS & create-react-app, then show you how to deploy that static site on AWS using S3 buckets as well as how to cache it & add SSL certificates with CloudFront CDN & Certificate Manager. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago

• Optimizing Costs in DevOps: Migrating a Kubernetes App from Amazon to Digital Ocean

  AWS, as one of the leading cloud service providers, offered us a comprehensive suite of services such as AWS EKS, AWS RDS, and others, as well as a wide range of managed services, including databases, storage solutions, and machine learning capabilities, providing us with the flexibility and agility to host our complex platform. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago

• A Brief History Of Serverless

  In 2006, Amazon launched EC2 and S3 which was the foundation of the first major cloud platform, AWS. Amazon decided to essentially provide their users with storage and virtual machines to operate. They had excess servers in their datacenters and saw this as an opportunity to make some extra money. - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago

• Day 1: Introduction to AWS

  To start using AWS, you need to create an AWS account. You can sign up for an AWS account at https://aws.amazon.com/. Once you have an account, you can access the AWS Management Console, which is a web-based interface for managing AWS services. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago

mozjpeg mentions (13)

• It's the future – you can stop using JPEGs

  It would be nice if the author would add mozjpeg[1] to the comparison. At certain sizes, it can produce smaller sizes than WebP, and because it is still a jpeg, it has a much better compatibility story, which the author alluded to. [1]https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Random Code Inspiration Volume 2

  Image-shrinker is a simple, easy to use open source tool for shrinking images. Under the hood it uses pngquant, mozjpg, SVGO, and gifsicle. You can also install these tools individually if you need to compress some images. I often use pngquantafter exporting PNGs for web projects from Figma or similar tools. I literally run it like this:. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

• JPEG XL: How It Started, How It’s Going

  > MozJPEG is a patch for libjpeg-turbo. Please send pull requests to libjpeg-turbo if the changes aren't specific to newly-added MozJPEG-only compression code. https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg#mozilla-jpeg-encoder-proj.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Why there may never be a libjpeg-turbo 3.1

  FWIW, Mozilla has been maintaining their own fork for quite a while now[1] AFAIK most Linux Distros have been using libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg, after some drama in ~2010 where libjpeg came under new management, decided to break ABI/API several times over and add incompatible, non-standard format extensions[2]. [1] https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• Are all JPEG compression implementations the same?

  No. See https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg Also, there is a fairly big problem with JPG that the ‘quality’ setting is not calibrated. That is you might look at one image and think it looks fine (which is subjective, depends on what you want to use the image for…) with a quality of 60%, but then you compress a million images at that rate, delete the originals, then... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago