Amazon API Gateway VS Scotty

Deploying Dart functions to AWS Lambda enables you to utilize them not only within AWS Lambda but also integrate them with services like Amazon API Gateway, allowing you to leverage them in Flutter applications as well. This unified codebase in Dart offers great convenience. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago

Moreover, integrating rate limiting can thwart DDoS attacks, and schema validation can prevent malformed requests, ensuring only legitimate and well-formed traffic reaches your serverless functions. Tools like Amazon API Gateway, Azure API Management, and Google Cloud Endpoints offer these capabilities, allowing you to set up custom authorization workflows and request validation rules that align with your security... - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago

Amazon API Gateway is a fully managed service by Amazon Web Services that provides customers with the capability to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. API Gateway is using regional endpoints that can be deployed in multi-AWS Regions to enable reduced latency. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

Amazon API Gateway receives the message from the WhatsApp webhook (previously authenticated). - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

This is where we turn to the tried and true Amazon API Gateway and its many integrations. Using API Gateway, we can use services like AWS Lambda or AWS Step Functions to run logic against the payload that we receive. We can also use these integrations to return responses back to the user. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

I would suggest checking out scotty for the http server - it uses warp by default, and is very beginner-friendly. Source: 11 months ago

If you're not a fan of the ruby-on-rails / swiss army knife approach that IHP takes, check out Scotty. Add Lucid for Html rendering, and Selda for Postgres. (There are other options for any of these tools if you prefer) - Scotty (simple web routing) https://hackage.haskell.org/package/scotty. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Writing a Haskell webserver (maybe using scotty) and call it from node. Source: over 1 year ago

I think ‘worst’ is very subjective here. It certainly does aim to be an all-encompassing ‘framework’ — but this is hardly unusual amongst web libraries (not just for Haskell!), and I feel Yesod gets the job done pretty well. Of course, Haskell has many alternatives if you don’t like Yesod: amongst other libraries, there’s Servant [0], snap [1], scotty [2], and the lower-level wai [3] and warp [4] if you feel the... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

I've found htmx and hyperscript talking to scotty to be an easy way to get something like this going while retaining the joys of Haskell on the backend and avoiding the pains of Haskell on the frontend. Source: almost 2 years ago