Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AirMessage VS Bitmessage

Compare AirMessage VS Bitmessage and see what are their differences

AirMessage logo AirMessage

Use iMessage on any Android phone 💬

Bitmessage logo Bitmessage

Bitmessage Wiki
  • AirMessage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-23
  • Bitmessage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17

AirMessage features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Support
    AirMessage allows iMessage functionality on Android devices by connecting through a Mac, bridging the gap between iOS and Android ecosystems.
  • Open Source
    The AirMessage server is open source, allowing users to review the code for transparency, implement custom features, or contribute to its development.
  • Feature Parity
    AirMessage tries to maintain as much of the native iMessage experience as possible, including features like group chats, attachments, and read receipts.
  • Privacy Focus
    By not relying on third-party servers and keeping data on your own Mac, AirMessage provides a private communication solution, reliant only on your own infrastructure.

Possible disadvantages of AirMessage

  • Requires a Mac
    A significant limitation is the need for a Mac to act as a server, which may not be feasible for all Android users wanting iMessage access.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup requires technical knowledge to configure networking and computer settings correctly and ensure reliability and security.
  • Connectivity Dependency
    The service relies on the Mac being on and connected to the internet, which could result in service interruptions if the connection drops.
  • Potential Security Risks
    Running any server on a private device entails understanding and managing potential security risks, especially when configuring network access.

Bitmessage features and specs

  • Decentralization
    Bitmessage is a peer-to-peer, decentralized messaging system, which means it doesn't rely on any centralized server for sending and receiving messages. This enhances privacy and security as there is no single point of failure or control.
  • Anonymity
    Users can communicate without revealing any personal information, as Bitmessage does not require a user account or identity, helping to protect user privacy.
  • Encryption
    Messages are end-to-end encrypted, ensuring that only the intended recipient can read the message contents. This makes it difficult for eavesdroppers to intercept or decipher messages.
  • Spam Resistance
    Bitmessage requires proof-of-work to send messages, which helps resist spam and denial-of-service attacks, as there is a computational cost to sending messages.

Possible disadvantages of Bitmessage

  • Resource Intensive
    The proof-of-work requirement and the need to maintain a full copy of the blockchain on local devices can make Bitmessage resource-intensive in terms of computational power and storage.
  • Latency
    Due to the decentralized nature and reliance on proof-of-work, sending and receiving messages can be slower compared to traditional messaging systems.
  • User Experience
    The user interface and experience might be complex for average users, limiting its accessibility and widespread adoption.
  • Network Overhead
    The network can become less efficient with higher traffic, since each node must process every message, which might lead to scalability issues.

AirMessage videos

AirMessage installation tutorial

Bitmessage videos

Security Now 420: BitMessage

More videos:

  • Review - Bitmessage and Wireless CTF from Shmoocon 2014, Hak5 1523
  • Review - Bitmessage - P2P-Email

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AirMessage and Bitmessage)
Communication
67 67%
33% 33
Messaging
71 71%
29% 29
Group Chat & Notifications
Instant Messaging
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AirMessage and Bitmessage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AirMessage seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 53 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AirMessage mentions (53)

  • Beeper – Moving Forward
    BTW, if Beeper goes away, there's always AirMessage¹ and Texts² for extending iMessage to Android and desktops. ¹ https://airmessage.org/ ² https://texts.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Fuck Apple.
    Bluebubbles or Airmessage are some good solutions. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Apple cuts off Beeper Mini's access
    This already exists! https://airmessage.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Beeper Mini appears to have been shut down by apple
    You can get iMessage on your Android phone with AirMessage https://airmessage.org/. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Which apps do you install first on any new Mac?
    If you know any android users willing to put in some extra legwork (and some money to buy an old mac mini) highly recommend checking out AirMessage they have an accompanying android app that lets you use imessage on android by forwarding the messages through a mac mini. Or any mac really. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Bitmessage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Bitmessage yet. Tracking of Bitmessage recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AirMessage and Bitmessage, you can also consider the following products

Psi-IM - Psi-IM is a messaging program that is designed for the XMPP network.

Gajim - Full featured and easy to use Jabber client

Miranda NG - Miranda NG is a successor of a popular multi-protocol instant messaging client for Windows - Miranda IM. Very light on system resources and extremely fast.

Empathy - Apps/Empathy - GNOME Wiki!

Pinger - Pinger lets you text and talk free with the people you care about most, anywhere on the planet.

CoyIM - CoyIM is a safe and secure chat client.