Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

AIDE - Android IDE VS Xamarin.Android

Compare AIDE - Android IDE VS Xamarin.Android and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

AIDE - Android IDE logo AIDE - Android IDE

AIDE is a monster of an app.

Xamarin.Android logo Xamarin.Android

Integrated environment for building not only native Android but iOS and Windows apps too.
  • AIDE - Android IDE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-16
  • Xamarin.Android Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06

AIDE - Android IDE features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Xamarin.Android features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Development
    Xamarin.Android allows developers to write for multiple platforms using a single codebase, facilitating code reuse and reducing development time and costs.
  • Native Performance
    Applications built with Xamarin.Android can achieve near-native performance levels, leveraging platform-specific APIs and hardware capabilities.
  • Shared Codebase
    Developers can share a large portion of their code across different platforms (i.e., Android, iOS, Windows), simplifying maintenance and updates.
  • Access to .NET Libraries
    Xamarin.Android enables the use of the extensive .NET ecosystem and libraries, providing a robust and well-supported development environment.
  • Strong Integration with Visual Studio
    Xamarin offers seamless integration with Visual Studio, allowing developers to use familiar tools and workflows to debug, test, and deploy their applications.

Possible disadvantages of Xamarin.Android

  • Overhead and Package Size
    Xamarin.Android applications can have larger package sizes and extra overhead compared to natively developed applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers coming from a purely native Android development background (Java/Kotlin) may face a steep learning curve when transitioning to C# and the Xamarin framework.
  • Limited Access to Latest Features
    Sometimes there may be delays in gaining access to the latest Android features and updates, as Xamarin bindings need to be updated to support them.
  • Performance Overheads
    While near-native performance is achievable, there may be some performance overheads especially with complex applications requiring extensive platform-specific optimizations.
  • Community and Support
    Although Xamarin has a dedicated community, it is smaller compared to native Android development communities, which may result in fewer resources and less community support.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AIDE - Android IDE and Xamarin.Android)

AIDE - Android IDE

Xamarin.Android

IDE
12 12%
IDE
88% 88
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Text Editors
16 16%
Text Editors
84% 84
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AIDE - Android IDE and Xamarin.Android. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Xamarin.Android seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AIDE - Android IDE mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AIDE - Android IDE yet. Tracking of AIDE - Android IDE recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Xamarin.Android mentions (6)

  • Why is Android Development so difficult/complex? (compared to Web and Desktop)
    Take a look at https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/apps/mobile. It will allow you to write Android apps in C# in Visual Studio. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Stop EU Chat Control
    > It's not hardware. So now are kernel extensions also “applications”? > VSCode is an app that needs the .NET runtime, in order to run the code you write in e.g. C#. You could not possibly be more wrong. VSCode is written in Typescript. It is an Electron app. There have been cross platform JS frameworks that ran on iOS for a decade. Besides that, it’s been years since you have needed the .Net runtime to run... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • this sub in a nutshell
    Ah, so C# (and .NET) does have its answer to Qt, point taken. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Which programming language to learn next (as a competitive programer before college)?
    C# can be used for mobile and macOS - https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/apps/xamarin/mobile-apps. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How good is .Net Core for iOS apps?
    Iric that’s only possible with Microsoft Xamarin. Never used it, rarely hear about it. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AIDE - Android IDE and Xamarin.Android, you can also consider the following products

Android Studio - Android development environment based on IntelliJ IDEA

RAD Studio - RAD Studio 10.2 with Delphi Linux compiler is the fastest way to write, compile, package and deploy cross-platform native software applications. Learn more.

B4X - Cross platform development tools for native iOS, Android, desktop and server applications.

Rider - Rider is a cross-platform .NET IDE based on the IntelliJ platform and ReSharper.

MIT App Inventor - App Inventor is a cloud-based tool, which means you can create apps for phones or tablets right in your web browser.

Qt Creator - Qt Creator is a cross-platform C++, JavaScript and QML integrated development environment. It is the fastest, easiest and most fun experience a C++ developer could wish for.

Loading...