Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AccessLint VS Thunder Client

Compare AccessLint VS Thunder Client and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

AccessLint logo AccessLint

AccessLint finds accessibility issues in your GitHub PRs

Thunder Client logo Thunder Client

Rest API client for VS Code, lightweight Postman alternative
  • AccessLint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-25
  • Thunder Client Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

AccessLint features and specs

  • Automatic Accessibility Checks
    AccessLint automates the process of checking for accessibility issues in web applications, helping developers ensure compliance with accessibility standards efficiently.
  • Integration with CI/CD
    The tool integrates well with continuous integration and deployment pipelines, enabling seamless accessibility testing as part of the development workflow.
  • Detailed Issue Reporting
    AccessLint provides detailed reports on accessibility issues, making it easier for developers to understand and address the problems.
  • Saves Time
    By automating accessibility checks, AccessLint saves significant time for developers compared to manual testing.

Possible disadvantages of AccessLint

  • Dependency on Automated Tools
    AccessLint relies on automated tools which might not catch all accessibility issues, especially those requiring manual verification such as color contrast or logical flow.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated testing tools, AccessLint may produce false positives or negatives, which could lead to confusion or unnecessary work.
  • Requires Initial Setup
    Integrating AccessLint into a development workflow requires initial setup and configuration, which might be a hurdle for some teams.
  • Limited Scope
    AccessLint's automated checks are limited to certain types of issues, potentially missing out on a comprehensive analysis of accessibility.

Thunder Client features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Thunder Client offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to create and manage API requests without getting overwhelmed by complex features.
  • VS Code Integration
    Being an extension for Visual Studio Code, it is convenient for developers who already use VS Code, enabling seamless API testing within their development environment.
  • Lightweight
    Compared to other API testing tools, Thunder Client is lightweight, making it ideal for users who need a quick and simple solution for testing APIs without extensive configuration.
  • Environment Variables
    The tool allows the use of environment variables, enabling users to manage different environments effectively and switch between them easily.
  • Support for Collections
    Supports organizing requests into collections, allowing for efficient management and categorization of related requests.

Possible disadvantages of Thunder Client

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Thunder Client lacks some of the advanced features found in more robust API testing tools, such as automation scripts and extensive plugin support.
  • Dependency on VS Code
    As a VS Code extension, it requires Visual Studio Code to run. This dependency can be a drawback for users who prefer other code editors or standalone applications.
  • No Collaboration Features
    Unlike some other API testing tools, Thunder Client does not have built-in collaboration features, which can limit its use in team environments.
  • Platform Specific
    It is primarily designed for use within Visual Studio Code, which may not be ideal for users who work across multiple platforms or require a standalone solution.

Analysis of Thunder Client

Overall verdict

  • Thunder Client is a good option for developers who want a minimalistic and efficient tool for testing APIs without the need for a standalone application. It is particularly beneficial for those who use Visual Studio Code as their primary development environment.

Why this product is good

  • Thunder Client is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a popular choice for developers who require a lightweight API testing solution. It is integrated directly into Visual Studio Code, allowing users to manage API requests without switching between applications. It supports RESTful services and offers features like collections, environment variables, and authentication support, comparable to other tools but within a more streamlined interface.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer working within Visual Studio Code
  • Those who need a simple and fast tool for testing REST APIs
  • Developers looking for an alternative to more complex API testing tools
  • Teams or individuals with straightforward API testing needs and require easy sharing of request collections

AccessLint videos

Install AccessLint for GitHub Accessibility Review

Thunder Client videos

Thunder Client - API testing right inside VSCode

More videos:

  • Review - Do you really need Postman? | Use Thunder Client - VSCode extension | Easy & Lightweight
  • Review - Thunder client - Vscode extension | Say no to Postman

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AccessLint and Thunder Client)
SEO
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
API Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AccessLint and Thunder Client. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AccessLint and Thunder Client

AccessLint Reviews

We have no reviews of AccessLint yet.
Be the first one to post

Thunder Client Reviews

Best Postman Alternatives To Consider in 2025
This free, feature-rich extension integrates seamlessly with VSCode, making it ideal for developers who prefer a unified environment. Thunder Client offers collection management, environment variables, and basic automation capabilities. It stands out for its tight integration with VSCode's debugging tools.
15 Best Postman Alternatives for Automated API Testing [2022 Updated]
Thunder Client is a Vscode Postman alternative that runs as a Visual Studio Code extension (not open source). Its design focuses on simple and efficient HTTP clients while constructing or connecting with APIs. Thunder Client can handle a wide range of API requests. It effectively processes immense amounts of data simultaneously while not slowing down the VS Code program.
Source: testsigma.com
Top 5 Postman alternatives
Thunder Client is a VS Code extension focusing on being a simple and efficient HTTP client while building or integrating with APIs. It supports collections as a way to group relevant requests. Moreover, ThunderClient supports the concept of Environment and Environment Variables to store and re-use values within multiple requests. Finally, ThunderClinet offers a UI that you...
Source: testfully.io

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AccessLint and Thunder Client, you can also consider the following products

HTML Validator - HTML Validator is a Mozilla extension that adds HTML validation inside Firefox and Mozilla.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Rocket Validator - Site-wide Accessibility and HTML validation made easy. With a single click, Rocket Validator will check thousands of web pages on your site for Accessibility and HTML conformance, producing a detailed, actionable report on seconds.

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a dev‑friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

W3C Markup Validation Service - Validates HTML markup of web pages, one at a time.

EchoAPI - Next-gen API development collaboration platform. More than just API design, debug, test, load-testing, and mock.