Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

W3C Markup Validation Service VS AccessLint

Compare W3C Markup Validation Service VS AccessLint and see what are their differences

Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

W3C Markup Validation Service logo W3C Markup Validation Service

Validates HTML markup of web pages, one at a time.

AccessLint logo AccessLint

AccessLint finds accessibility issues in your GitHub PRs
  • W3C Markup Validation Service Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-30
  • AccessLint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-25

W3C Markup Validation Service features and specs

  • Standards Compliance
    The W3C Markup Validation Service ensures that your web pages conform to established web standards, helping to improve web interoperability and accessibility.
  • Error Identification
    The service identifies errors and warnings in your HTML and XHTML documents, making it easier to debug and fix these issues to improve code quality.
  • Improved Compatibility
    By validating your markup, you can better ensure that your web pages are compatible with various browsers and devices, providing a more consistent user experience.
  • Free of Charge
    The validation service is provided by W3C at no cost, making it an accessible tool for developers of all levels to enhance their web projects.
  • Educational Tool
    For beginners in web development, the W3C Validator can serve as an educational resource by highlighting common mistakes and promoting best practices in coding.

Possible disadvantages of W3C Markup Validation Service

  • Limited to Syntax
    The validator primarily checks for syntax errors and does not assess other vital web development aspects such as design or functionality.
  • Outdated Standards
    The tool relies on W3C's standards, which can sometimes lag behind real-world usage and popular web development trends, potentially limiting its relevance.
  • Overly Strict
    The validator can be overly strict, flagging non-critical issues that may not impact user experience but are still considered 'errors' by the tool.
  • Misinterpretation of Results
    Less experienced developers might misinterpret the validator's results, focusing too much on achieving perfect validation without understanding the real impact on usability.
  • Lack of Support for Modern Frameworks
    As a markup validator, it might not fully support or correctly evaluate modern JavaScript frameworks that generate markup dynamically.

AccessLint features and specs

  • Automatic Accessibility Checks
    AccessLint automates the process of checking for accessibility issues in web applications, helping developers ensure compliance with accessibility standards efficiently.
  • Integration with CI/CD
    The tool integrates well with continuous integration and deployment pipelines, enabling seamless accessibility testing as part of the development workflow.
  • Detailed Issue Reporting
    AccessLint provides detailed reports on accessibility issues, making it easier for developers to understand and address the problems.
  • Saves Time
    By automating accessibility checks, AccessLint saves significant time for developers compared to manual testing.

Possible disadvantages of AccessLint

  • Dependency on Automated Tools
    AccessLint relies on automated tools which might not catch all accessibility issues, especially those requiring manual verification such as color contrast or logical flow.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated testing tools, AccessLint may produce false positives or negatives, which could lead to confusion or unnecessary work.
  • Requires Initial Setup
    Integrating AccessLint into a development workflow requires initial setup and configuration, which might be a hurdle for some teams.
  • Limited Scope
    AccessLint's automated checks are limited to certain types of issues, potentially missing out on a comprehensive analysis of accessibility.

W3C Markup Validation Service videos

+ Add

A Walkthrough the W3C Markup Validation Service

AccessLint videos

+ Add

Install AccessLint for GitHub Accessibility Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to W3C Markup Validation Service and AccessLint)

W3C Markup Validation Service

AccessLint

SEO
89 89%
SEO
11% 11
SEO Tools
90 90%
SEO Tools
10% 10
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100
Website Monitoring
100 100%
Website Monitoring
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using W3C Markup Validation Service and AccessLint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, W3C Markup Validation Service seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 98 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

W3C Markup Validation Service mentions (98)

  • HTML Validation
    How to use HTML Validation service 👇 Step 1: Access the HTML validator ● Open the HTML validator in your web browser i.e go to https://validator.w3.org/. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • WebKit Fix: Quirk News.Y Combinator to Skip TextAutoSizing
    Looking at the html of HN's pages, can't blame them really. Running though https://validator.w3.org/ , the result is abysmal. At this rate, if web browsers started requiring sites to output HTML that is somewhere in the realm of normalcy, HN would sooner shut down than consider ever updating. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • We Need to Talk More About Conformance, If We Want to Stop Fantasy HTML
    Whether you’re a frontend developer, lead, or manager, reconsider your expectations and practices if you haven’t yet chosen not to ship erroneous HTML. The more of us decide to talk about using actual HTML on our sites and in our apps, and lead by example, the better for our users and clients, and the better for our craft and profession. On the engineering side of web development, it’s HTML first—if it is HTML. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • What is cross-browser compatibility, and why should you care?
    Validate Your Code Include tools like W3C code validation service and CSS validator to ensure your code meets web standards. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • What You Need to Know About Domain and Hosting
    ===> Click here to run your code through the HTML validator. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

AccessLint mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AccessLint yet. Tracking of AccessLint recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing W3C Markup Validation Service and AccessLint, you can also consider the following products

Rocket Validator - Site-wide Accessibility and HTML validation made easy. With a single click, Rocket Validator will check thousands of web pages on your site for Accessibility and HTML conformance, producing a detailed, actionable report on seconds.

HTML Validator - HTML Validator is a Mozilla extension that adds HTML validation inside Firefox and Mozilla.

PageSpeed Insights - PageSpeed is addon for ...

Total Validator - Total Validator can check your website to help ensure that it is accessible, uses valid HTML and CSS, has no broken links, and is free from spelling mistakes.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Nibbler - Free tool for testing how good your website is, and what you can do to improve it. Check accessibility, SEO, social media, compliance and more.

Loading...