A2Hosting Reviews

1. Paul Rowe

   | System Administrator at Bangles | over 1 year ago
   Good hosting service

   Pros: - Great hosting plans, especially for WordPress - Outstanding client service - Fantastic uptime - Excellent money-back return policy

   Cons: - Comparatively pricey

   👍 Pros:    Great customer support|High uptime|Money back guarantee

   👎 Cons:    Pricy

Reviewable Reviews

A2Hosting mentions (3)

• Cheap domain?

  Either way you'll end up using a host like a2hosting.com (search for "a2hosting comparison" to find other hosts) which let you put up your own web pages because listing domains only on Afternic, Sedo, GoDaddy, etc., still doesn't give you much more visibility than posting them as For Sale on which ever domain name service/registrar you choose, which in itself gives you little visibility except to sharks who cruise... Source: 6 months ago

• Need to move site from bluehost to a quicker wordpress hosting platform with an easy to use UI - what should I pick?

  The sidebar has plenty of hosts for you to choose from. Additionally, I personally use A2 hosting (https://a2hosting.com) for my hosting needs. They've been a pleasure to work with over the last few years. Source: about 2 years ago

• Every web hosting I try is either jank or too advanced.

  a2hosting is fast, but pretty expensive. Source: almost 3 years ago

Reviewable mentions (21)

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• The GitHub for Code Review UI Needs Serious Innovation

  Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• Software Engineering at Google

  Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Codereview: Should the Go project stop importing GitHub PRs?

  The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• Show HN: Visibly – More Collaborative and Efficient Code Reviews on GitHub

  >See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago