A.I. Experiments by Google VS Facebook.ai

Try this: https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai. Source: over 1 year ago

But Google has a whole set of AI writing tools - https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai So by their own definition they are producing spam? - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai might also help (I haven't used this IRL). Source: over 2 years ago

It's hard to imagine you've not seen Google's doodle guessing training (or their other experiments) but it's just another example of how little information you actually need to create a recognizable image, though Canvas also shows this off, but it has the benefit of material information. Source: over 2 years ago

To come back to your original question, as far as I'm aware anyone can publish on arxiv or researchgate. People will just tend to take you less serious. Maybe a better solution for you is something like this https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai . You already said you think your idea might be industry changing so if it truly is, I'm sure people will start noticing you. Source: almost 3 years ago

Many settings affect the outputs in interesting ways, but that's half the fun. These LoRAs are very lightly trained; more training may or may not help. The competitions are also performed using zero-shot text guessing, and if Facebook said it, you can bet that's actually Meta AI saying it, and they are leaders in the field. Source: about 1 year ago

You should look at the entire niche of MAE-related papers, that's quite exciting, and the neuroscience-inspired stream of stuff like Barlow Twins. As well, the official Facebook AI blog is surprisingly good coverage of much of the interesting un/semi-supervised DL research FAIR does, and worth going through. Source: over 1 year ago