Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

960 Grid System VS Skeleton CSS

Compare 960 Grid System VS Skeleton CSS and see what are their differences

Limey
Limey: Connect smarter with QR codes, links, sites, and digital business cards in one place. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

960 Grid System logo 960 Grid System

The 960 Grid System is an effort to streamline web development workflow by providing commonly used...

Skeleton CSS logo Skeleton CSS

A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development
  • 960 Grid System Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-18
  • Skeleton CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

960 Grid System features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Skeleton CSS features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Skeleton CSS is extremely lightweight, with a file size of just about 400 lines of code, making it quick to load and easy to manage compared to bulkier frameworks.
  • Simplicity
    Its simplicity makes it easy to learn and implement, which is ideal for beginners or for small projects that don't require complex styling.
  • Responsive Grid
    Skeleton CSS includes a responsive grid system, which helps in creating responsive layouts that easily adjust to various screen sizes.
  • Clean Design
    Skeleton offers a clean and minimal design by default, providing a good starting point for further customization without unnecessary bloat.

Possible disadvantages of Skeleton CSS

  • Limited Components
    Skeleton CSS lacks the range of components available in larger frameworks like Bootstrap or Foundation, making it less flexible for larger or more complex projects.
  • Customization
    While its simplicity is an advantage, it also means less out-of-the-box customization options compared to more comprehensive frameworks.
  • Community and Support
    Skeleton CSS has a smaller community and fewer resources or plugins available, meaning less peer and developer support is accessible compared to more popular frameworks.
  • Scalability
    It is less suited for large-scale applications where a more feature-rich and modular framework might be necessary to manage complex requirements.

960 Grid System videos

No 960 Grid System videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Skeleton CSS videos

+ Add

Skeleton Anatomy and Physiology Review Bones 01

More videos:

  • Review - skeleton anatomy easy review for practical exam bones and structures
  • Review - Unboxing and Review Head Unit Skeleton SKT 8197 Universal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to 960 Grid System and Skeleton CSS)

960 Grid System

Skeleton CSS

Design Tools
14 14%
Design Tools
86% 86
CSS Framework
11 11%
CSS Framework
89% 89
Developer Tools
17 17%
Developer Tools
83% 83
Development Tools
17 17%
Development Tools
83% 83

User comments

Share your experience with using 960 Grid System and Skeleton CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare 960 Grid System and Skeleton CSS

960 Grid System Reviews

20 Best Front-End Frameworks For Bootstrap Alternative
Gumby is a flexible and responsive framework built with the power of Sass for faster web development. Its customizer allows you to easily tweak and customize the entire UI kit design to meet your best preference. Gumby has multiple types of grids with different column variations, but by default, Gumby comes with 960 grid system.
Source: beebom.com

Skeleton CSS Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
Balance Functionality and Performance: High functionality might come with the cost of performance. For example, MUI is exceptional for material design, but it might be heavier compared to lighter frameworks like Skeleton. Strive for a balance between the functionality you need and the performance you can afford to sacrifice.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
However, it's important to note that Skeleton lacks active maintenance, posing a significant drawback. Additionally, the security of the Skeleton website is currently questionable. Furthermore, its use of outdated markup for layout, such as floats and clear fixes, may present compatibility issues in modern web development environments.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Skeleton is a lightweight CSS framework, majorly popular for its 12-column fluid grid, which consists of rows and columns, similar to other CSS grids. The newer version of Skeleton adopts a mobile-first approach, which enables the layout to be the center of attraction, irrespective of the screen size. Being lightweight, Skeleton can speed up the front-end development process.
Source: hackr.io
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
As the name suggests, the Skeleton is a light framework. If your website is small and straightforward, Skeleton provides a necessary collection of CSS elements to speed up your development. It provides lightly styled forms, tabs, buttons, etc. You get a responsive grid, Vanilla CSS, and media queries for your project without the larger frameworks' complexities. It is a great...
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
As a two-in-one solution, Skeleton quickly made it on our list. This is both a boilerplate and a comprehensive CSS framework. We enjoyed customizing its 12-column grid during our testing, and we found out that it has virtually no learning curve.
Source: www.webdesignerdepot.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Skeleton CSS should be more popular than 960 Grid System. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

960 Grid System mentions (2)

  • An Overview of 25+ UI Component Libraries in 2023
    Back in the day, web designers were hand-writing CSS, which, trust me, was a journey full of twists (for more on this, see CSS The Good Parts). Then the 2000s hit, bringing with them CSS frameworks like Blueprint, 960 Grid System, YUI Grids, and YAML (probably not the YAML you’re thinking of). These frameworks introduced responsive grids and clean UI elements, changing the game. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • CSS Is Good Now?! What Did I Miss In The Last Decade?
    However I just got a new job in the past year and wow I realized my knowledge is way behind. Like, as far behind as somebody in the IE9 days would've been who was stuck doing table-based design. Like, as far behind as somebody in 2013 would've been if they were still stuck using 960.gs for their layouts. Source: about 2 years ago

Skeleton CSS mentions (17)

  • Concrete.css
    I had been using similar projects such as skeleton[0] and milligram[1] for small experiments such as repfl[2], and wanted to create something similar that I would find aesthetically pleasing and that would fit in as little space as possible. The current version of concrete.css is less than 1kb minzipped! [0] http://getskeleton.com/ [1] https://milligram.io/ [2] https://repfl.ch/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: How to build online calculator website?
    Here's my personal goto: Find some minimal CSS framework. My preference is Skeleton [0] or Bootstrap [1]. The key is just finding something minimal that works without too much fuss. Personally, I rather have a minimal framework provide 'responsiveness' so I don't have to worry about it but I also want it to get out of the way of anything I do. Use JQuery [2]. Don't rely on CSS for animations or interactivity. In... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Suggest minimal CSS framework
    I've used http://getskeleton.com/ in the past. I think it's probably just what you're looking for. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pdf generated from form
    I use an older css library called skeleton. It’s a utility framework that came out before css grid. It has a really nice and easy to use grid system built without css-grid. I had to get rid of the media queries to get it work but it’s been great otherwise! Source: over 2 years ago
  • what do you do when coding for responsive?
    I use a minified and customised simple boilerplate / grid system based in skeleton (http://getskeleton.com/). It has no mediaqueries predefined, but the rules for each screen resolution are stated. I start making the website for computer screen formats (large resolutions) and end adapting up the design to phone screens. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing 960 Grid System and Skeleton CSS, you can also consider the following products

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Unsemantic CSS Framework - Unsemantic is a fluid grid system that is the successor to the 960 Grid System.

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Foundation - The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Semantic UI - A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language

Loading...