When it comes to testing code, both frameworks are very much comparable since you can test either using the versatile RSpec library. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
When starting a Rails project, you have a lot of decisions to make. Whether or not to write tests should not be one of them. The big decision is to use Minitest or Rspec. Both of those testing frameworks are great and provide everything you need to test a Rails application thoroughly. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
As a beginner you can skip it, just focus on understanding Rails' philosophy and getting comfortable with it. However, make sure you remember to come back to unit testing later bc it's a mandatory skill for a Rails developer. Unit test can help you understand your project's specs thoroughly (assume its test coverage is more than 90%). I recommend learning RSpec instead of Rails' built-in testing tool (the one... Source: 10 months ago
RSpec is a testing framework for Ruby that is widely used in the Ruby on Rails community. It allows developers to write and execute automated tests. RSpec promotes behavior-driven development (BDD) by providing a readable syntax for describing the expected behavior of the application. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
In the Ruby programming language, one of the most popular testing frameworks is RSpec. RSpec is a flexible and expressive testing tool that allows you to write and run automated tests for your Ruby code. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
There’s one very readable way to do it in Ruby using RSpec. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
As a former Ruby developer I was a bit disappointed with the lack of tools akin to RSpec. Source: over 1 year ago
The above test is written using the RSpec testing framework. While RSpec is a popular choice for Ruby on Rails apps, there are plenty of testing frameworks to choose from for most programming languages and frameworks. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Opal-RSpec is an Opal port of RSpec, a well known Ruby testing tool, allowing you to easily test your Ruby applications in browser and in Node, just like you can do so with MRI. Source: over 1 year ago
However, many alternatives to Minitest are available. The most popular one is RSpec. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Rspec is a ruby gem that allow us to test our applications, it provides the best way to do TDD while developing new features. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
It’s assumed that you already have a Rails app and use Brakeman to keep your app secure and Rspec to run your test cases. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Should_equal(item.price, 19.99) This concept is what Rspec and some other Ruby frameworks are based on. Source: almost 2 years ago
Some BDD frameworks such as JBehave, RSpec, Mocha, Jasmine, Cucumber, among others, embrace the use of this template. Spek is not an exception to this rule. The main difference is that it doesn’t force you to use a concrete assertion framework or additional behavioral files (e.g Cucumber or JBehave). - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Ruby/Rails enjoy some really nice and powerful Behavior Driven Design/Development testing frameworks like Cucumber and RSpec. Source: about 2 years ago
Let’s look at this script. My Ruby is rusty, but I tried my best. We set all our requirements, set a timer to make the thread sleep (more on that later), and then we write our test. In the script, we are writing the tests using the RSpec. RSpec is a domain-specific language built using Ruby to test Ruby code. We use this to test our behaviors using the describe and it blocks. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Crystal provides a built-in test runner and a fully-featured spec library, inspired by Rspec. I tried out the built-in spec library, and it worked pretty well, but found myself reaching for more of what I was used to from the actual Rspec gem. This led me to discover the Spectator shard, which provided most of the Rspec helpers I was used to and made me feel much more productive. I definitely recommend it! - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Linux (Fedora), gvim (because it opens a new window instead of taking up yet-another-terminal-tab), fluxbox (because it has awesomely configurable hot-key support), dotfiles, chruby + ruby-install (with rubies installed into /opt/rubies), bundler + rspec + yard + rubygems-tasks + gemspec_yml + GitHub Actions on all of my Ruby projects. Source: about 2 years ago
RSpec - Behavior driven development for Ruby. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
I think that code definitely should describe what it's doing, tests should explain how it's doing it as far as possible (though this requires discipline to have loosely coupled and testable code, which isn't always the case) and that there still should be comments that explain the realities of needing technical solutions for people problems and all of the aspects that are carried with this. Doing anything less... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
And this project is totally independent of rspec.info. Source: almost 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing RSpec to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about RSpec. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.