Table of contents
Performance
Pyright is known for its speed and efficient performance, providing developers with rapid type-checking without significant lag, thanks to its implementation in TypeScript.
Type Inference and Checking
Pyright offers excellent type inference capabilities, supporting Python's dynamic nature while effectively checking for type-related issues.
Ease of Integration
It integrates smoothly with most editors, especially Visual Studio Code, allowing for seamless use directly within the development environment.
Configurable
Pyright is highly configurable, allowing developers to tailor its behavior to their specific project needs, enhancing flexibility in various development scenarios.
Active Development
Being backed by Microsoft, Pyright benefits from frequent updates and active community support, ensuring it stays up to date with the latest Python features.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Pyright is good.
Check the traffic stats of Pyright on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Pyright on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Pyright's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Pyright on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Pyright on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Mypy (and pyright occasionally) as a type checker,. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Disclaimer: I don't work on big codebases. Pylance with pyright[0] while developing (with strict mode) and mypy[1] with pre-commit and CI. Previously, I had to rely on pyright in pre-commit and CI for a while because mypy didn’t support PEP 695 until its 1.11 release in July. [0] -- https://github.com/microsoft/pyright. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
Static Type Checking with PyRight: Improve code quality and reduce bugs with PyRight, a static type checking feature not available in R. This proactive error detection ensures your applications are reliable, before you even start them. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Pyright is a fast type checker meant for large Python source bases. It can run in a “watch” mode and performs fast incremental updates when files are modified. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
You can use pyright instead[0]. It is the FOSS version of pyright, but having some features missing. [0]: https://github.com/microsoft/pyright. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
This is not the case! After reading the LSP help pages (:help lsp), I installed and configured two language servers: Typescript Language Server for JavaScript and Pyright for Python. Neovim has fantastic defaults, so things like tags, omnicompletion, and semantic highlighting (New in 0.9) are enabled and configured by default as long as your language server supports them. You can see my configuration below. Source: over 2 years ago
I've had lots of success using pyright [1] for Python projects, it has sensible defaults and can be configured with a pyproject.toml file so everyone's using the same settings. I use the Pylance VSCode extension to catch errors earlier, but I also put it in pre-commit and as a CI check, so all contributors are committing the same quality of typed code. With more complex types, I've found it isn't necessary to do... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I use pyright as my LSP in Neovim for Python code, so I just use mypy for static type checking within CI/CD and GitHub actions. Source: over 2 years ago
As other folks have commented, type hints are now a big deal. For static typing the best checker is pyright. For runtime checking there is typeguard and beartype. These can be integrated with array libraries through jaxtyping. (Which also works for PyTorch/numpy/etc., despite the name.). Source: over 2 years ago
Pyright can be configured through a file named pyrightconfig.json at the root of the code repository: https://github.com/microsoft/pyright/blob/main/docs/configuration.md I found that link from Pyright's README: https://github.com/microsoft/pyright. Source: over 2 years ago
Pyright – Static type checker for Python. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Pylance uses Pyright for type checking, so consult their GitHub for the rules it enforces (or even use Pyright directly). Pylance has a few other great features too, though. Source: almost 3 years ago
We integrated pyright into our CI/CD and ensured high conformance with it, Alongside mypy which we already have. Source: about 3 years ago
These aren't just some third-party bolted on. The type annotation syntax is built into the language[5] and standard library[6][7]. I personally find static typing to be more trouble than it's worth most of the time. Industry typing metalanguages are not expressive enough to deal with even fairly basic real-world programs and force you to write bad code to work around the type checker's stupidity. Maybe some day... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Auto-completion feature to write queries faster on editors supporting the Language Server Protocol And pyright like VS Code. Unfortunately, Pycharm has limited support for TypedDict and it doesn't work for now. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Pyright to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Pyright good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Pyright here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
