Easy Configuration
Pagekite offers a straightforward setup process, allowing users to quickly configure and deploy their services online without needing deep networking knowledge.
No Need for Static IP
It enables access to local servers without requiring a static IP address, making it ideal for users with dynamic IPs or on networks with strict NAT policies.
Supports Multiple Protocols
Pagekite supports HTTP, HTTPS, and arbitrary TCP protocols, providing flexibility for different types of web services and applications.
Custom Subdomains
Users can create custom subdomains, making it easier to remember and access their services remotely.
Security Features
It includes HTTPS support, which helps in securing the data transmitted between users and servers.
Pagekite is generally considered a good service for those who need to expose local servers to the web easily and securely.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Pagekite is good.
Check the traffic stats of Pagekite on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Pagekite on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Pagekite's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Pagekite on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Pagekite on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Pagekite provides a reliable, simple tunneling solution that supports a range of protocols and is easy to configure. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Choose a Tunneling Service. We suggest PageKite because they offer free accounts, simple requirements, and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
PageKite - Comprehensive open source solution with hosted options. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
One risk is that with some ISP's, the IP address can be geo located down to the neighborhood. It might be smart to use a tunneling service like https://ngrok.com/ or https://pagekite.net/, which essentially sets up a server somewhere else, which then forwards the traffic to your PC. But your viewers only get the IP of that server. Source: over 3 years ago
The story so far: I am creating a very, very simple website. So far, it is only an image and some text. I want to expose this website to the world, but my router is behind CGNAT. So, I use a tunnelling tool to expose it to the internet, then will use a domain to redirect it to the tunnel. I use pagekite to do this, since they have free 'permanent' subdomains (I cannot change every time I get a new ngrok link, not... Source: over 3 years ago
I haven't used them, but there are past posts mentioning LocaltoNet, PageKite, and ZeroTier. Source: over 3 years ago
Try https://pagekite.net to make your localhost server public. Source: almost 4 years ago
To share out of your network I suggest you to do it through pagekite.net and you can add an extra password access there, or you can just share and ssh port through pagekite and create a dynamic tunnel each time you want to access to that website. NOTE: pagekite will limit you up to 2.5gb monthly free. Source: almost 4 years ago
Cloudflare tunnels will be able to see your traffic (I assume in this case: matrix communications are e2ee and only metadata can be collected). I would recommend using https://pagekite.net that allows you to terminate TLS connections on your machine at home instead of a server in the cloud. I would also like to share my setup which is a bit different. Source: almost 4 years ago
Btw, this is what http://pagekite.net/ is for. Tl;dr reverse proxy service to tunnel out of your network and give you an external ip. Source: over 4 years ago
I thin local hardware makes more sense for LAN-only sites - e.g. a company wiki, a media center or a file storage with web interface. For anything that is supposed to be visible on the internet, I'd always serve the site from the data center - if nothing else, because I really don't want to open an ingress into my personal home network, even if my ISP permitted that. For use-cases were you have to handle... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Basic usage, gives `http://localhost:80/` a public name: $ pagekite.py NAME.pagekite.me To expose specific folders, files or use alternate local ports: $ pagekite.py /a/path/ NAME.pagekite.me +indexes # built-in HTTPD $ pagekite.py *.html NAME.pagekite.me # built-in HTTPD $ pagekite.py 3000 NAME.pagekite.me # HTTPD on 3000 To expose multiple local servers (SSH and HTTP): $ pagekite.py... Source: almost 5 years ago
Pagekite has garnered a diverse range of opinions from users, reflecting various experiences and needs across its user base. Positioned within Localhost Tools, Testing, Webhooks, and Tunnel markets, Pagekite competes against other prominent services such as ngrok, Portmap.io, and Vercel, among others. Adhering to recent discussions and mentions, here's a consolidated view of the public perception of Pagekite.
Pagekite is often noted for its flexibility as a tunneling service that facilitates the exposure of localhost servers to the Internet. Its distinct characteristics, such as support for HTTP/HTTPS, SSH, and TCP protocols, cater to a wide range of application scenarios. Moreover, the service offers both free and paid options, allowing users to try its features without immediate financial commitment. Pagekiteโs account setup requires a one-time configuration, where a subdomain tied to the userโs email is established, which proves to be convenient for many users seeking persistent subdomain use.
The platform is praised for its ease of use and seamless onboarding process, appealing to users who prioritize simplicity. The setup, utilizing Python commands, is straightforward although the requirement for Python2 is flagged, suggesting potential limitations for users leveraging more modern environments. Its ability to facilitate self-hosting and integration within home networks, circumventing common issues such as Carrier-Grade NAT (CGNAT), extends its appeal, primarily within individual developers and small self-hosting projects.
Community forums illustrate that Pagekite is frequently recommended for scenarios where setting up a secure, shareable link is necessary, particularly in projects constrained by local access restrictions. However, some users express concern over occasional accessibility issues, such as trouble accessing sites via mobile devices or minor setup hurdles faced when linking custom domains.
In comparison articles, Pagekite is acknowledged alongside tools like Localtonet and ngrok, often noted for its reliable tunneling functions. While ngrok tends to be more universally recognized, Pagekite is highlighted specifically for its open-source nature and straightforward, perpetual subdomain model. For users desiring localized control with SSL termination, Pagekite's capability to handle TLS connections on personal machines is advantageous, promoting enhanced privacy control over data flows.
The limitations cited in user discussions include the monthly data cap imposed on free accounts (2.5 GB/month), which may restrict usage for more bandwidth-intensive applications. Moreover, while Pagekite offers a reliable up-and-running service for immediate exposure of localhost servers, users with advanced needsโparticularly those involving high traffic volumes or complex network configurationsโmay seek more scalable solutions.
Pagekite fulfills a niche yet significant role in the tunneling service domain, particularly appealing to users who prioritize easy setup and reliable localhost access. While it may not lead in all functionalities compared to heavyweights like ngrok, its unique features such as permanent subdomains and open-source availability endear it to a particular segment of the market. Users are advised to weigh its capabilities against their specific needs, particularly in terms of data usage and external access requirements.
Do you know an article comparing Pagekite to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Pagekite good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Pagekite here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.