LambdaTest Reviews and details

Screenshots and images

Badges

<a href='https://www.saashub.com/lambdatest?utm_source=badge&utm_campaign=badge&utm_content=lambdatest&badge_variant=color&badge_kind=approved' target='_blank'><img src="https://cdn-b.saashub.com/img/badges/approved-color.png?v=1" alt="LambdaTest badge" style="max-width: 150px;"/></a>

Show embed code

Videos

Reviews

1. 

   Alina-Novikava    

   Software QA Engineer at uTest | over 3 years ago
    

   LambdaTest an essential tool for cross browser compatibility

   Initially we were skeptical whether a cloud infrastructure would be able to give us the flexibility, speed and browser coverage we need for our agile sprints. But LambdaTest has been a complete value for money to us.

   They usually get the latest browsers on-board under 2 weeks time and are never compromising the experience over legacy browsers at the same time. The machines are quick to load and we rely heavily over the Monday integration, it helps us share screenshots instantly among ourselves without having to be stuck in long email chains.

   We have been using LambdaTest for around 8 months and it has been so far so good.

   🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting

   👍 Pros:    Underpass app, very helpful for local testing on development environment|Stability is good, downtimes are notified if any|Up to date with latest browsers and os like safari 14, macos big sur|Integrations with monday, jira, and more prominent tools

   👎 Cons:    Need more devices for screenshot testing|Would love to see mobile application testing

2. 

   Lee Jelley    

   DevOps & Cloud Engineer at Contino | over 3 years ago
    

   LambdaTest Our Go-To Platform For Selenium Testing

   LambdaTest has made our testing process less tedious with automated parallel testing. Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple hours. Parallel testing has helped us with faster feedback loops to scale up our go to market efforts.

   Having a global user base we have active traffic from varied locations and testing on multiple platforms and browsers is a continuous process for the team. The feature that stands out for us is geolocation testing, all you need to do is run the capabilities and test the website for the desired location. We use Azure Pipelines for CI/CD and LambdaTest extension for Azure has helped us get a seamless testing experience for our privately hosted projects. Thanks to that we are now able to easily ensure browser compatibility for all the changes before we move them to Prod. Kudos to the team!

   🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting

   👍 Pros:    Support team is very active|Extensions to perform testing with ci/cd tools like azure pipelines|Always up to date with latest browsers|Offers 70+ integrations, glad to see it integrates with jira|Affordable pricing option

   👎 Cons:    Cypress integration is missing|Native app testing is not available yet

3. 

   Rod Morales    

   Front End Developer at SavvyCard | over 3 years ago
    

   Easy, Useful and provides lots of data for debugging

   Have been using Lambdatest for around 6 months now, and could say that it’s a useful testing tool for our team. Offering great combinations of browsers and operating systems for you to test on and most importantly there are many types of additional logs that come with each test which helps in debugging.. Glad to see the integration with Travis CI due to which we could optimally use this tool with our CI CD pipelines directly. We were able to effectively run TestNG and Selenium tests using their documentation and as an added advantage their support team is quick and helpful

   🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting

   👍 Pros:    Detailed documentation, helps you with quick implementation|Apis for extracting test run data like logs and run video|Good community to help to dig deep for possible outcomes.|Screenshot testing feature|Integration with jira

   👎 Cons:    There is a latency in a single test when compared to a local machine. maybe because of the cloud? so you have to run in parallel to cut down on testing times.

4. 

   Dan Bovey    

   Front-End Developer at POQ | over 3 years ago
    

   Good collection of browsers and it’s scalable!

   Using LambdaTest automation we could run all our functionality tests suits across multiple browsers and OS. Helped us identify UI misalignment specific to browsers or functionality failure due to incompatibility with a particular browser. The good part is you can automate screenshots and get insights into where and which browser your website’s UI is going off. Then we can use the live feature to identify and debug the compatibility issue. We strongly believe customer experience is the key and that could impede your product growth. With lambdatest, we could see improvements in identifying errors before our customer does.

   Cons: Mobile application testing would be helpful for us.We have been asking the support team for this feature but it's yet to be implemented. Would also like to see more devices for screenshot testing.

   🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting, BrowserStack

   👍 Pros:    Offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation|You can select browsers, os, country and start testing instantly.|Offers integration with ci/cd tools like jenkins, gitlab

   👎 Cons:    Mobile application testing would be helpful for us.|Would also like to see more devices for screenshot testing.

5. 

   Vitalii Fokin    

   Senior QA Analyst at EPAM Systems | over 3 years ago
    

   Very Useful Cross Browser Testing Tool!

   Initially we had mixed feelings about trying this tool for our automation tests, however the trial period itself made us realize why investing in this tool would be worthwhile. Never knew our app was breaking in so many browsers !!

   LambdaTest provides a good stack of web browsers environments to test against for running both manual and automated tests. The setup was super easy and intuitive, which is a big thumbs up! Interactive dashboard, very easy to navigate, and integration with Jira saves a lot of time. We now run multiple tests in Parallel on different combinations of browsers. So we increased our browser coverage and brought our whole pipeline to the cloud. This also improved the productivity of the team.

   👍 Pros:    Scalability with multiple parallel instances|Ability to integrate with gitlab and affordable pricing options|Geolocation testing

   👎 Cons:    Support for cypress is not there

6. 

   Ravshan Kulakhmetov    

   Senior QA at ServiceTitan | over 3 years ago
    

   Nice tool to support our testing team.

   We are using the tool for cross-browser compatibility testing of both our production apps and prototypes. The UI is very neat, all features are easy to reach and intuitive, and most importantly, the feature to send issues directly to Backlog is a major time saver. We are now running all our regression test suites over LambdaTest, and we are very happy with the browser coverage we are getting.

   🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs

   👍 Pros:    Integration with backlog, jira|Latest browsers to test from|Offer visual appeal supported with screenshots|Reliable service, as we use automation suite for running tests throughout

   👎 Cons:    Can improve on loading time, be more quicker|Doesn’t support native app testing

7. 

   Sanaya Dinshaw    

   Senior Front End Developer | over 3 years ago
    

   LambdaTest does the heavy lifting for us!

   Lambdatest is extremely helpful while performing regression tests for us. Couldn’t have imagined setting up our own infrastructure to conduct parallel tests.

   Before taking up the cloud option we used a single machine and 60 UI tests were run serially, the time consumption was a huge setback here. Lambdatest helped us with all the heavy lifting by providing options to choose as many VM’s you need without any maintenance cost. And moreover, our web app runs on multiple platforms and Lambdatest supports these platforms with a great list of browsers to test on. Decently priced, this tool saved us a lot of money and time.

   🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting

   👍 Pros:    A developer driven company which can be seen with their constant updates and clear documentation.|Highly satisfied with how their support team helped us with the issues|Geolocation and integrations are a huge plus for us|Priced smartly but it's affordable then other similar tools

   👎 Cons:    Feature to fasten the product feedback loop|Connection errors sometimes which means i have to reconnect

8. 

   Neha_Gupta    

   Product Manager at Micrfo | over 3 years ago
    

   Opted LambdaTest for - Pricing and Support

   Our previous tool was a dent for us in terms of pricing so while looking out for alternatives, Lambdatest seemed to be the right fit that we could explore. Had few doubts for the parallel tests and its pricing but the support team was efficient to justify and explain the process to set up. And since then it's been the permanent tool for us!

   Being a fast pace web development agency, we needed a robust platform that could help us serve the demand in time. The tool caters to our needs as the one click bug management is extremely useful for us.

   👍 Pros:    Ability to automate the screenshot tests|Documentations are self explanatory and well written|Pricing will be the winner for us with $180 annually

   👎 Cons:    Speed and loading time issues with vm|Mobile app testing feature can be added

9. 

   Lewis Coldwell    

   Full Stack Developer at Vamp | over 3 years ago
    

   Impressive Array of browsers to choose from - Savior!

   Being an e-commerce website, our main concern was to make sure that we don't lose out on customers due to bad shopping experience. LambdaTest proved to be a savior for us here, as one platform does the job! My team was able to test our website across varied browsers (based on our target audience) and reflect on any bugs encountered. We use TeamCity to manage projects and were surprised to see LambdaTest offering integration with the tool.

   I would say we stumbled across the right tool at a right time.

   👍 Pros:    The ui is pretty clean and easy to navigate|Choices of browsers massive and responsive testing becomes easy|Integrations and convenience are the win points here|Free to start - use and then decide to buy

   👎 Cons:    If possible to simulate the finger pinch - felt missing|Taking screenshot gets a bit buggy sometimes

10. 

    Priyada Panicker    

    Freelance Front-End Developer at Ishir | over 3 years ago
     

    2000+ Browsers to Test On

    I am a freelance web developer and own a Mac machine and therefore do not have the access of the browsers that come with a Windows OS. But, whenever I need to test my client’s website on these browsers LambdaTest platform is where I go. Using this, I test my website across multiple browsers and their versions. I have been using this for 1 year and never got any issues. Plus they offer amazing 24x7 chat support to help me out whenever I am stuck.

    🏁 Competitors: CrossBrowserTesting, BrowserStack

    👍 Pros:    More than 2000 browsers to test on|24x7 active chat support

    👎 Cons:    Sometimes, recorded video takes time to get reflected in gallery

11. 

    Ethan Kanchan    

    Graphic Designer and Front End Developer at WebManagementConsultants | almost 4 years ago
     

    We love local page testing

    LambdaTest is used by the several employees in my company. We develop websites and web apps for our clients. Our team always performs tests on local web pages before making them live, so that they could provide pixel perfect experience to the visitors. The integrations are also very useful for us. They provide integration with Jira that makes it easy for us to share the bugs directly from the dashboard.

    🏁 Competitors: BrowserStack, Browsershots, browserling, Sauce Labs

    👍 Pros:    Local page testing|Wide range of integrations|One click bug logging

    👎 Cons:    Sometimes it gets slow when connecting to the lambda tunnel.|The recorded video takes time to get reflected in the gallery.

12. 

    Debashree Banerjee    

    Freelance Developer at Skylark InfoTech | almost 4 years ago
     

    LambdaTest Saves Time & Money For Us

    Being an IT outsourcing company for web development, Selenium testing became a routine exercise for us before we delivered our projects to clients. LambdaTest affordable pricing immediately caught our attention. However, we were initially hesitant if it would be as good as its competitors. We are glad they lived up to our expectations and even better. Especially their 24/7 customer chat support which helped us deliver our projects on time. We highly recommend every developer & tester to give LambdaTest a shot. To us, it is the best tool as of now.

    👍 Pros:    Live browser testing|Responsive testing|3rd party integrations

    👎 Cons:    Provides emulators and simulators instead of real devices|Video recording does not reflected into the gallery intantly

13. 

    Zahra Khan    

    CEO at Hauterfly | almost 4 years ago
     

    Simplified Browser Testing

    LambdaTest in our opinion is one tool that has simplified the complex process of cross-browser testing. In just a few clicks we were able to test our website on 100+ combinations of browsers & OS out of the 2000+ options. They have made the product so simple that it can be used any anyone. Recently we have subscribed to their automation plan with the help of which we are automating our entire web testing process, piece of advice (Automation plan is strictly for people who know selenium) To us, they are the most simple and straight forward tool.

    🏁 Competitors: browserling, Sauce Labs

    👍 Pros:    Localhost testing|2000+ browsers & os|Easy integration|Informative dashboard

    👎 Cons:    Just a feedback, like manual testing they should come up with a way to make automated testing easy for non tech users as well.

14. 

    Ronnie Ash    

    Software Developer at ArohaTech | almost 4 years ago
     

    LambdaTest Worked Best For Us

    When we planned to test our website for browser compatibility, we used many tools but among all the tools, we found LambdaTest most suitable because of its faster speed and low cost. The platform allowed us to test our website on a combination of 2000+ real desktop and mobile browsers. All you need to do is select a browser and its version, operating system, and screen size that you want to test the website on. LambdaTest also offers an amazing selenium grid which really helped us to cut our test execution time to half by performing tests in parallel, which was really cool.

    🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, BrowserStack, browserling, CrossBrowserTesting

    👍 Pros:    Neat and clean ui with all the necessary features|Allows users to run multiple tests in parallel.

    👎 Cons:    Not able to save passwords on their browser

15. 

    Aliyah Michle    

    Project Manager at IT Noida | almost 4 years ago
     

    Best tool to perform automated cross browser testing

    Using LambdaTest, you can perform automated browser testing with a few clicks and at a faster speed. Earlier we were using BrowserStack but that was expensive for us. After that, we came to know about LambdaTest, we tried it and found useful.

    🏁 Competitors: BrowserStack, browserling, Sauce Labs

    👍 Pros:    Faster and cheaper than others

16. 

    Guest    

    Marketer Tester | almost 4 years ago
     

    Best Tool for automated screenshot testing

    Using LambdaTest, we schedule our automated screenshot testing. It helps us a lot and saves time.

    🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, BrowserStack, browserling

    👍 Pros:    Faster testing|Lower price than others

17. 

    Jordon Peterson    

    Automation Testing at Master Control | almost 4 years ago
     

    Robust tool for browser testing

    Being a developer, responsive testing comes as a part of the package, every time I develop a webpage. I have been relying over LambdaTest for responsive testing. They have a feature which allows me to capture full page screenshots of my webpages in scores of different devices. I could even capture web pages that are locally hosted. And now, they have come up with a browser that lets me not only capture screenshots but interact with my websites in 25+ different devices, in a side by side view. That allows me to test my website responsiveness on a bunch of devices in a live-interactive manner. I must admit I am highly impressed by the LT browser and I am a tough guy to impress.

    🏁 Competitors: BrowserStack

    👍 Pros:    Web testing|Selenium testing|2000+ browsers & os|Customer support

18. 

    Edward J Evans    

    Test Automation Expert at Virgin Money | about 4 years ago
     

    Complete Value for Money

    LambdaTest has been a complete value for money as per my experience. The 3rd party integrations to Jira and Slack has helped my team collaborate better and deliver test cycles faster. Not to mention, the customer support is proactive which helps save a lot of time in release cycles, in case we come across any doubts. They have also made the local web app testing very easy through their ‘UnderPass’ application. You just need to add your user name & access key, this will help you test your locally hosted website which previously was a tedious process. As told their support really helps us in case we have any problem, kudos guys, long way to go.

    🏁 Competitors: BrowserStack

    👍 Pros:    Manual testinng|Customer support|Affordable price

Post a review

Do you know an article comparing LambdaTest to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.