This page is designed to help you find out whether JOE is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Listed in
Lightweight
JOE is a lightweight text editor that doesn't consume much system resources, making it ideal for use on older hardware or systems with limited resources.
User-Friendly Interface
The interface of JOE is relatively simple and familiar to users of classic text editors, which makes it easy to navigate without a steep learning curve.
Highly Configurable
JOE offers extensive configuration options, allowing users to customize the editor according to their preferences and needs.
Keyboard Shortcuts
The editor supports numerous keyboard shortcuts that help streamline tasks and enhance productivity for experienced users.
Support for Multiple File Types
JOE can handle a variety of file types, making it versatile for different types of projects and use cases.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if JOE is good.
Check the traffic stats of JOE on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of JOE on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of JOE's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of JOE on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about JOE on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Just use any linux or bsd, install joe editor package, disable graphical desktop and boot to console only. Done. https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Or they should just make sure emacs can work with the machine thru ssh, then there is nothing to install ;) if no ssh, then nano is not a bad option, though I would go with joe (https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/) which can also show the shortcuts, but much much more powerful, yet it's just a single ~700kbyte exe (or 1.5MB with some optional syntax highlighting grammars and docs). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Allow me to introduce you to WordStar, in the "modern" context of Joe's Own Editor. https://gizmodo.com/sci-fi-writer-releases-free-archive-of-legendary-word-processor-used-by-george-rr-martin-2000484618 https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe%27s_Own_Editor. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
The Joe editor has "jstar" where if you invoke the editor as this command it loads the Wordstar keymapping and looks/operates with the WordStar keybindings and screen interface. https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
> Unlike emacs or vim or even nano, it didn't have a bunch of invisible shortcut keys, just a Windows-like drop-down menu system (but rendered in DOS). You might like "joe", which was inspired by WordStar: . - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I actually have a bound set for WordStar 4. If you want to use something similar on modern systems, try "Joe's Own Editor." https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
JOE is pretty nice https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/ — a hybrid of WordStar and Emacs, and if you run it with `jstar` you get a pretty authentic WordStar experience which also reminds of the earliest Borland Turbo IDEs. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
If you want to change your workflow, you might consider using a terminal based text editor though. There are many out there, the most famous being vi or emacs (though both a bit hard to use) and packages specifically for word processing exist as well (for example https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/). It will need more getting used to, but this will pretty much run on a potato and you could use a pi zero or any... Source: almost 4 years ago
JOE [1] has worked this way as long as I remember (which is close to 20 years). [1] https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
I installed joe's own ediot https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/ by compiling it and using install script. I used it few times before going back to vim. Now I wanna uninstall it. Is there any 'automatic' way of uninstalling it? Source: about 4 years ago
Once on the machine within a machine within a machine, I could use vim or joe; at the time, I had only minimal familiarity with either one. I chose vim because it was modal. I had less of a chance of “making a change and accidentally saving it” with vim. For those not familiar, in this instance of PHP, whatever change you made to the file immediately took effect. There was no need to restart the web-server. It... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
If you do have a reason to open up a giant file (like a huge database dump or something), the only editor I've found that can truly handle them with ease is "Joe's Own Editor": https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. Source: over 4 years ago
My favourite editor is JOE - mainly cos I am an old git and it uses a lot of the Wordstar key bindings. Source: over 4 years ago
Joe's Own Editor is a thing since 1988 https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
I understand why people do it — it's fun, and you don't have to convince anyone else of your decisions. You want to make the default text editor joe, the default shell nushell, and every single gui element a shade of purple? You can! Without anybody to say no! Source: almost 5 years ago
For a couple of decades, my go-to terminal-based editor has been JOE (Joe's Own Editor). [1] JOE has everything I need — it's fast, it has syntax highlighting, multiple buffers, etc. Also, it uses the WordStar key bindings, which are the same bindings used by Turbo Pascal and the other Borland IDEs that I grew up with. But Micro looks great, too. [1] https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/ [2]... - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
Joe needs to be on that list. probably. https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago
The venerable joe editor (https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io) is apparently very comfortable for Wordstar users. I used it for a few years in college before I could afford enough RAM to run emacs and although I never actually used Wordstar myself and cant compare it that way, I really liked using joe and can still remember a lot of the keybindings 20+ years later. - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago
For a long time, I used Joe's Own Editor [1], which featured a WordStar keybinding mode. I still use it from time to time. [1] https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing JOE to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is JOE good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss JOE here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.