BTW you can use hat.sh website to encrypt a file with the browser on any device including phone (to decrypt you will have to visit the website) and the website runs locally on your browser so its not sending the file to any server. Source: 10 months ago
Hey so when looking at xchacha as it seems to be getting more and more popular in terms of adoption for securing files/messages etc. I noticed that when experimenting and testing file encryption with applications like dexios picocrypt and hat.sh that none of the files could be read/understood by other applications. While this doesn't happen with alot of other apps/algos likes aes afaik. Source: about 1 year ago
I usually use hat.sh in the browser. Source: about 1 year ago
Hey so I see that the website recommends picocrypt which uses xchacha20 and its made me go on a little bit of a rabbit hole of xchacha and how it compares to aes. I've also noticed that xchacha is getting adopted very quickly; companies like google; nordpass etc are using it over aes. Does this mean aes is on its way out? Why would a person/company move a lot of their systems to this honestly brand new algorythm... Source: about 1 year ago
I second this comment. https://hat.sh is probably the easiest. Especially if you are not able/allowed to install apps on your device. Source: over 1 year ago
You can always use a tool like hat.sh. Source: over 1 year ago
Encryption based on browser tool: https://hat.sh/. Source: over 1 year ago
If someone don't have time and need encrypt something fast, consider hat.sh,. Source: over 1 year ago
Might not be everybody but you can use https://hat.sh for file encryption. No app required. Source: over 1 year ago
In that case, system could be to outdated or other similar problems will appear. For an example: early version of XYZ Linux distributions & Windows 98/XP, not enough access to system (missing admin password) or other, similar problems. We assume here, some type of problem will exist. In that way, I can use Hat. Again simple, temporary option. Source: over 1 year ago
I want to ask about algorithms used in that tools: Picocrypt, Kryptor and Hat. I think which one tools should I chose and when. With my knowledge, theoretically the best option are Picocrypt and Hat, depends on situation. Source: over 1 year ago
I tested a few encryption open-source software programs: Picocrypt, hat.sh and Kryptor. I combine it all together, and my TXT file looks now that: hello.pcv.enc.pcv.kryptor. Source: almost 2 years ago
Yea, but mega.nz is well known and theoretically I have the master key and they cannot access my data, claimed by them. But if you share your storage in forums then they will investigate. Other cloud storages could go offline and all my data are unrecoverable. Cryptomator costs on android. Found this website: https://hat.sh. Source: about 2 years ago
I turned off my wifi and used hat.sh to encrypt a password protected 7z file, then decrypted it and everything worked smoothly. Source: about 2 years ago
I have some not-so-typical but exciting news about some experiments that I've done recently. For the past little while, I've been looking at new UI libraries for Picocrypt, when I came upon the idea of a fully in-browser encryption tool (like hat.sh, but simpler and lighter). Since I know the WebCrypto API has excellent support (all major desktop browsers and OSs, all major mobile browsers and OSs are supported),... Source: about 2 years ago
Hat.sh, in my experience, is pretty neat for individual files. It’s a web app, but works locally and without internet connection. Source: about 2 years ago
Including hat.sh, cryptomator etc. I need to share files from my personal computer to my work server and ensure I am not inadvertently transmitting a virus to the work server. Do any of these platforms also scan uploads for viruses or is there an alternative platform which does that and is also airtight in terms of security? Source: about 2 years ago
Not much, just visit the app at https://hat.sh. however, I just took a look at the upcoming features in the app (in the dev branch), looks like multiple files support is coming, that means beginners perhaps can ditch unfriendly softwares like rclone and cryptomator. Source: over 2 years ago
For individual files I recommend you to use Hat.sh, I have been using it for a while and it’s really great. I have individual files encrypted and some folders I zipped then encrypted. I just download the file from the cloud then decrypt it manually on my self hosted Hat.sh. Source: over 2 years ago
Hat.sh does everything in Browser. It loads all the things it needs does everything in the Browser locally. Source: over 2 years ago
I want it for quick and easy file encryption, without having to download any software for it. hat.sh works on pretty much any device, so that's pretty useful. I do have 7Zip as a software for encryption on my PC, but just in case. Source: over 2 years ago
Do you know an article comparing hat.sh to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about hat.sh. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.