fzy
A better fuzzy finder.
A better fuzzy finder.
This page is designed to help you find out whether fzy is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Listed in
Speed
Fzy is designed for speed and performance, making it one of the fastest fuzzy text selectors. It's capable of handling large lists with minimal delay.
Simplicity
Fzy has a simple and straightforward interface that focuses solely on fuzzy finding, without unnecessary complexity or additional features.
Accuracy
Fzy ranks matches according to their quality, ensuring that the most relevant results are presented first. This improves the accuracy of selections.
Lightweight
With a small footprint, fzy is lightweight and doesn't burden the system. It's ideal for use in scripts and environments with limited resources.
Terminal Integration
Fzy is optimized for terminal usage, allowing seamless integration into various shell workflows and terminal-based applications.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if fzy is good.
Check the traffic stats of fzy on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of fzy on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of fzy's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of fzy on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about fzy on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
> it supports my keystrokes You know that there is basically a standard set, imposed by Windows in about 1986 or something and also supported in GNOME 2, MATE, Xfce, LXDE, etc etc.? I am more interested in if it supports them. I mean, I don't know what your set are, and I am not for a moment saying there's anything wrong with them, but there are standards for this stuff, used heavily by millions of blind... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I've been mostly using fzy which is written in C. I hope skim's matching algorithm is as good as fzy's…. Source: about 4 years ago
Am I the only one who prefers FZY ? https://github.com/jhawthorn/fzy. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
A while ago there was a post on this sub about a plugin called wilder.nvim which looks absolutely awesome. Wilder seems super configurable and it's README has a bunch of different suggested configurations. However, it is designed to work with both Vim and Neovim, but does have a config for Neovim, but it depends on kinda odd plugins like cpsm (which uses ctrlp.vim) as well as fzy. Source: about 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing fzy to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is fzy good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss fzy here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
