Table of contents
Most published papers with phylogenies as a major result should include the tree in some form as part of the supplementary material. For just visualizing trees, I'd recommend something like FigTree, which is pretty straightforward and has a nice interface (though limited ability to actually do much with them). It should be able to read files with .tre, .nexus, or .newick extensions (the latter of which is just the... Source: 5 months ago
Again, this is an overall about phylogeny, not knowing how your data looks like I would sugges futher reading, the programs commonly used are: PAUP, MEGA, PHYLIP, TREE-PUZZLE and MrBayes. Options are: FigTree, PRABI and BEAST. Source: over 1 year ago
Yes, because TRACER has nothing to do with the tree log file, and (almost) never records anything to do with the tree. First, locate the summary tree output file. This is produced by one of the following functions: consensusTree() mapTree(), mccTree(). Then make sure you have tree viewing software installed like figtree. Then open the summary tree file in your tree viewing software, and find the appropriate menu... Source: almost 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing FigTree to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about FigTree. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
