Table of contents
User-Friendly Interface
FigTree offers a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to visualize and manipulate phylogenetic trees, even if they have limited experience with similar tools.
Customization Options
The software provides a variety of options for customizing the appearance of trees, including fonts, colors, and branch styles, which helps in producing publication-quality figures.
Supports Multiple File Formats
FigTree supports several common file formats for phylogenetic trees, such as NEXUS and Newick, easing the process of data import and export.
Annotation Features
It allows users to annotate trees with labels, node bars, and other markers, providing more detailed visual information about the phylogenetic data.
Cross-Platform Availability
FigTree is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, Mac, and Linux, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if FigTree is good.
Check the traffic stats of FigTree on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of FigTree on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of FigTree's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of FigTree on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about FigTree on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Most published papers with phylogenies as a major result should include the tree in some form as part of the supplementary material. For just visualizing trees, I'd recommend something like FigTree, which is pretty straightforward and has a nice interface (though limited ability to actually do much with them). It should be able to read files with .tre, .nexus, or .newick extensions (the latter of which is just the... Source: over 2 years ago
Again, this is an overall about phylogeny, not knowing how your data looks like I would sugges futher reading, the programs commonly used are: PAUP, MEGA, PHYLIP, TREE-PUZZLE and MrBayes. Options are: FigTree, PRABI and BEAST. Source: over 3 years ago
Yes, because TRACER has nothing to do with the tree log file, and (almost) never records anything to do with the tree. First, locate the summary tree output file. This is produced by one of the following functions: consensusTree() mapTree(), mccTree(). Then make sure you have tree viewing software installed like figtree. Then open the summary tree file in your tree viewing software, and find the appropriate menu... Source: about 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing FigTree to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is FigTree good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss FigTree here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
