Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Zospace UI Kit VS Three.js

Compare Zospace UI Kit VS Three.js and see what are their differences

RealityMAX
RealityMAX is the AI-powered 3D design collaboration platform, 100% online. Cooperate remotely with your colleagues on 3D projects and easily share your work with clients. Create Web3D and AR experiences in a snap, without a line of code. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Zospace UI Kit logo Zospace UI Kit

Create cosmically awesome Tailwind templates in minutes

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • Zospace UI Kit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-01
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

Zospace UI Kit features and specs

  • Comprehensive Components
    Zospace UI Kit offers a wide variety of components that cater to different UI needs, making it versatile for multiple types of applications.
  • Customization
    The kit provides numerous customization options, allowing developers to tailor components to fit their project's unique style and branding.
  • Responsive Design
    Designed with responsiveness in mind, Zospace ensures that applications built with its components work well on different screen sizes and devices.
  • Ease of Use
    Even developers with basic front-end knowledge can easily integrate and use the components, thanks to the intuitive design and well-organized documentation.

Possible disadvantages of Zospace UI Kit

  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve if they are unfamiliar with certain web development concepts or the specific frameworks that Zospace supports.
  • Limited Free Preview
    The offering of a free preview or trial might not be extensive, potentially requiring a purchase to fully explore all components and features.
  • Dependency on Shuffle Platform
    To get the most out of Zospace, users might need to be within the Shuffle ecosystem, which could limit flexibility if they prefer other platforms or tools.
  • Design Consistency
    While customization is a pro, maintaining design consistency across all components might require additional effort, especially for large projects.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Zospace UI Kit videos

No Zospace UI Kit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Three.js videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Zospace UI Kit and Three.js)

Zospace UI Kit

Three.js

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
Flowcharts
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Zospace UI Kit and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Zospace UI Kit and Three.js

Zospace UI Kit Reviews

We have no reviews of Zospace UI Kit yet.
Be the first one to post

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be a lot more popular than Zospace UI Kit. While we know about 248 links to Three.js, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Zospace UI Kit. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Zospace UI Kit mentions (3)

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Zospace UI Kit and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS Play - An advanced online playground for Tailwind CSS

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Artemis Dashboard for Tailwind CSS - A new UI library for busy developers by the Shuffle team

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

Loading...