Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Zero Install VS Batchpatch

Compare Zero Install VS Batchpatch and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Zero Install logo Zero Install

Zero Install is a decentralised cross-distribution software installation system.

Batchpatch logo Batchpatch

Stop dreading Microsoft’s Patch Tuesday every month and finally take control of your patching...
  • Zero Install Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-26
  • Batchpatch Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-09

Zero Install features and specs

  • Dependency Management
    Zero Install handles dependency management automatically, which reduces the complexity associated with manually resolving dependencies for software packages.
  • Cross-Platform
    Zero Install supports multiple operating systems including Linux, Windows, and macOS, providing a uniform method for software distribution across different platforms.
  • Security
    Applications are cryptographically signed and verified, ensuring integrity and authenticity of the software being distributed and installed.
  • No Root Required
    Zero Install does not require root or administrator privileges to install software, making it safer and easier to use, especially in restricted environments.
  • No Central Repository
    Zero Install does not rely on a central repository. Developers can distribute software from their own servers, giving them more control over updates and releases.
  • Version Control
    It supports using multiple versions of software simultaneously, enabling users to test and run different versions without conflicts.
  • Lightweight
    Zero Install maintains a lightweight footprint because it does not copy software into a central repository but uses existing locations.

Possible disadvantages of Zero Install

  • Adoption Rate
    Zero Install is not as widely adopted as other package managers like APT or YUM, which can result in a smaller community and fewer available packages.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve when first using Zero Install due to its unique approach to software distribution and management.
  • Lack of Standardization
    Since there is no central repository, the quality and standards of distributed packages can vary, sometimes making it harder to ensure consistency.
  • Dependency on Network
    Zero Install relies on URLs to fetch software, so a stable internet connection is essential for installing and updating packages.
  • Performance Overhead
    The initial setup and dependency resolution can take some time, potentially leading to a performance overhead during the first run.

Batchpatch features and specs

  • Centralized Management
    BatchPatch provides a centralized interface to manage and deploy updates across multiple systems, which saves time and reduces the complexity involved in patch management.
  • Ease of Use
    The tool is designed with a user-friendly interface, making it accessible for IT administrators to quickly learn and use without extensive training.
  • Scheduling Flexibility
    BatchPatch allows users to schedule patches, updates, and deployments at convenient times, minimizing disruptions to business operations.
  • Cost-Effective
    As a one-time purchase software, BatchPatch can be more cost-effective compared to other subscription-based patch management tools.
  • Offline Update Support
    The tool supports deploying updates in offline environments, which is beneficial for networks with limited or no internet access.

Possible disadvantages of Batchpatch

  • Limited Platform Support
    BatchPatch is primarily focused on Windows systems, which may not be suitable for environments with diverse operating systems.
  • No Native Cloud Integration
    The software lacks native cloud integration, which might limit its utility for organizations moving towards cloud-based infrastructures.
  • Scalability Challenges
    While effective for small to medium-sized networks, BatchPatch may encounter performance issues in larger, enterprise-level environments.
  • Lack of Advanced Reporting
    The tool does not provide as comprehensive reporting features as some competitors, possibly limiting insights into patch compliance and system status.
  • Manual Setup Required
    Initial configuration can be time-consuming as BatchPatch requires manual setup and configuration on each target machine.

Zero Install videos

Zero Installation Purifier Reverse Osmosis Unboxing - Demo - Review

Batchpatch videos

No Batchpatch videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Zero Install and Batchpatch)
Software Marketplace
100 100%
0% 0
Patch Management
0 0%
100% 100
OS & Utilities
77 77%
23% 23
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Zero Install and Batchpatch. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Batchpatch should be more popular than Zero Install. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Zero Install mentions (5)

  • Self-contained Python scripts with uv
    Overall, and admittedly from a bit of a distance, uv run feels like a reinvention of Zero Install, but for only Python. I also wondered why virtual environments were invented for Python when general environment managers (like Modules) already existed. These packaging and environment problems have never been specific to Python https://0install.net/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Using jlink to cross-compile minimal JREs
    Sounds like https://0install.net which has been around for a while. Personally I prefer to avoid 'installing' anything: if something's written in Java, its launcher should reference some specific java binary; if something's written in Python, it should reference some specific python3 binary; etc. For example, my job is mostly writing Scala and building it with Maven; yet I have neither installed system-wide.... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Go binding for upx utility
    It seems more like a package manager. https://0install.net/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ubuntu's Snap performs application updates without user consent
    The article mentions Snap, AppImage and FlatPak, but there is also a much older system called 0install (zero install) that was started in 2003 or so [1]. I wonder why that never took off. [1] https://zero-install.sourceforge.net/roadmap.html (note this is the old website; the new website is https://0install.net - looks like it's still getting releases in October this year). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Flaptak (and Snap) is not the future
    That's true, future app distributions should utilize web 3.0, e.g. decentralization. There is 0install ( https://0install.net/ ), for example, it is better. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

Batchpatch mentions (12)

  • Looking for a patch management solution
    I hear good things about Batch Patch. Seems simple and more importantly, cost effective. Source: about 2 years ago
  • What software/tools should every sysadmin have on their desktop?
    If your a smaller it department, batchpatch is also pretty handy: https://batchpatch.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What software/tools should every sysadmin have on their desktop?
    Batchpatch (https://batchpatch.com/ Does patching but also bulk execute scripts on multple computers in the Windows enviroment). Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to send a command to install windows patches on windows servers remotely?
    Https://batchpatch.com It’s cheap and pretty useful, sure you can script everything it does if you want, but for the price, why bother. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What would you recommend for Windows Servers update automation ?
    Linux sysadmin here, I'm happy with batchpatch for the Windows hosts that are in my fleet. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Zero Install and Batchpatch, you can also consider the following products

Patch My PC - Patch My PC Updater is a free, easy-to-use program that keeps over 300 apps up-to-date on your computer.

WSUS Offline Update - Using "WSUS Offline Update" (formerly known as "ct offline update" or "DIY...

IObit Software Updater - IObit is an application that updates the software of your PC to keep all the software properly working.

WHDownloader - A lightweight and easy to use Downloader which allows you to find and apply the latest Microsoft Windows updates....

HEIMDAL FREE - HEIMDAL FREE is an application to automate your device software updates in order to improve your security.

SolarWinds Patch Manager - SolarWinds Patch Manager is an intuitive patch management software for quickly addressing software vulnerabilities.