Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Zellij VS qemacs (for quick emacs)

Compare Zellij VS qemacs (for quick emacs) and see what are their differences

Zellij logo Zellij

A terminal workspace with batteries included

qemacs (for quick emacs) logo qemacs (for quick emacs)

Savannah is a central point for development, distribution and maintenance of free software, both GNU and non-GNU.
  • Zellij Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-04-23
  • qemacs (for quick emacs) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-14

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Zellij and qemacs (for quick emacs))
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100
Terminal Tools
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Zellij and qemacs (for quick emacs). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Zellij seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Zellij mentions (5)

  • Lsix: Like "Ls", but for Images
    I switched to Zellij[1] a few years back, and I've been enjoying Sixel support since sometime in 2022. If you're looking to shake up your workflow, I find it's a vastly superior experience to tmux out of the box. It ships with all the features I would otherwise add through external plugins and convoluted configuration scripts by default while remaining significantly more stable and more performant. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 8 days ago
  • Lsix: Like "Ls", but for Images
    I used to do all of this type of stuff to get my copy-paste to work in tmux but honestly it's still a pita. The alternative I started using recently (zellij[1]) has copy and paste just working out of the box with no fancy configuration required and also has a much saner session management mechanic that also works right out of the box. [1] https://zellij.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 days ago
  • `tmux` is worse is better
    Being a big tmux fan, I never thought it would come to something like this, but Zellij (https://zellij.dev/) has completely solved this for me. I generally run Zellij on my laptop and tmux on remote servers -- it's been a surprisingly positive experience so far. Try it out -- your tmux muscle memory (e.g. All the hotkeys you remember) will also work out of the box. - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago
  • `tmux` is worse is better
    Sounds like you might like Zellij: https://zellij.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago
  • `tmux` is worse is better
    My use-cases are pretty basic, and my use isn't all that frequent, but I've been very happy with: https://zellij.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago

qemacs (for quick emacs) mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of qemacs (for quick emacs) yet. Tracking of qemacs (for quick emacs) recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Zellij and qemacs (for quick emacs), you can also consider the following products

tmux - tmux is a terminal multiplexer: it enables a number of terminals (or windows), each running a...

Kakoune - Vim inspired — Faster as in less keystrokes — Multiple selections — Orthogonal design

byobu - Byobu is a GPLv3 open source text-based window manager and terminal multiplexer.

Light Table - Light Table is a new interactive IDE that lets you modify running programs and embed anything from...

GNU Screen - Screen is a full-screen window manager that multiplexes a physical terminal between several...

Textadept - Textadept is a cross-platform text editor that runs on different types of platforms, that allows to control over the application using Lua programming language.