Yodeck VS ASP.NET

Yodeck Reviews

1. Nathan Hardin    

   over 3 years ago
   The dumbest side by side

   YoDeck is awesome for what it is intended for... DIGITAL SIGNAGE! Dropbox is also good for it's intended purpose... CLOUD STORAGE!

   Comparing these two against each other is like comparing an apple to a ballcap... they are completely unrelated. Therefore this comparison is the dumbest of all time!

ASP.NET Reviews

Yodeck mentions (4)

• Looking for Advice

  Yodeck works offline for up to 30-45 days. It is free for a single screen and the 4GB Player costs $99/unit (unless you have some other player hardware you would like to use, so no need to buy that). As soon as you get it online, it should update the content. Just make sure that you have a big enough data plan. Source: about 1 year ago

• PBi Report on smart TVs

  We use Yodeck for that. Of course getting a Raspberry Pi right now is the issue. Source: about 1 year ago

• Power BI

  Yodeck connects to PowerBI directly from each Player, not from the backend. We do have many customers displaying PowerBI dashboard, and we are now building an even better integration. You could try it out - order a Player for $79, try it out, and if it does not work as you need it, you can always return it and get a refund. Source: over 2 years ago

• Want to make seniors reminder board with R.Pi 4 and monitor

  You might want to check out Yodeck. It’s a hosted solution and you get one free player. They have an image to install on your pi. Source: over 2 years ago

ASP.NET mentions (19)

• What’s New in Bold Reports 6.1 April 2024 Release

  The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago

• Is ASP.NET Core the next step in my career being an ASP.NET MVC developer? Or are there other technologies I should look at?

  Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: about 1 year ago

• Mixing GCloud and F#

  Cloud functions run aspnet core under the hood, but since it is a controlled environment it was designed in a way that the only concern you should worry about is running your function so all of the usual boilerplate related to adding services, middleware or enabling features is hidden away from you which for most simple scenarios this is what you will need and in the case of F# where dependency injection is more... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Professional transition from Java to C#?

  I'm doing "backend data processing microservices" and the main framework component is ASP. Source: over 1 year ago

• Mudblazor for Blazor

  .NET has had various templating frameworks since its inception in the early 2000's. From the likes of Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), Windows Forms(WF), ASP.NET Core MVC, Razor Pages to Blazor and now .NET MAUI. Microsoft offers a way to choose an ASP.NET Core web UI for developers to find the right user interface(UI) to use for their solution. The focus however is on Blazor and in particular for webAssembly. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago