Yarn VS Ninja Build

Let’s see how we could set up a shiny new JavaScript project using the Yarn package manager. We are going to set up nodenv, install Node.js and Yarn, and then initialize a new project that we will then be able to use as a foundation for our further ideas. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago

# .gitignore .yarn/* !.yarn/patches !.yarn/plugins !.yarn/releases !.yarn/sdks !.yarn/versions # Swap the comments on the following lines if you don't wish to use zero-installs # Documentation here: https://yarnpkg.com/features/zero-installs # !.yarn/cache .pnp.* Node_modules. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago

If you need help with setting up the project, I recommend that you follow this guide from Yarn documentation. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

Install Yarn or NPM to add the required packages and modules. - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago

Have Node and Yarn installed with a recent version. - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago

Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 11 months ago

Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago