Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
XSL
EJS

XSLT in-browser implementation VS EJS

Compare XSLT in-browser implementation VS EJS and see what are their differences

NinjaOne
NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

XSLT in-browser implementation logo XSLT in-browser implementation

XSLT is a cross-browser API for converting XML data into string or virtual DOM implemented natively with multithreaded streaming processing.

EJS logo EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.
  • XSLT in-browser implementation Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-28
  • EJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-11

XSLT in-browser implementation features and specs

  • Client-Side Processing
    XSLT processing in the browser shifts the computational load from servers to clients, potentially reducing server load and making better use of client-side resources.
  • Dynamic Page Updates
    XSLT can enable real-time updates to the DOM structure, allowing for dynamic content adjustment based on XML data inputs without needing to reload the web page.
  • Separation of Concerns
    XSLT allows developers to separate the logic for transforming XML data from HTML layout, leading to more organized and maintainable code.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Being an established standardized technology, XSLT is supported by most modern web browsers, enabling good cross-browser functionality.
  • Rich XML Support
    XSLT is designed to handle XML data efficiently, making it a good choice for applications that heavily depend on XML formats.

Possible disadvantages of XSLT in-browser implementation

  • Performance Overhead
    Client-side XSLT transformations can introduce performance overhead, especially on devices with limited processing power or when dealing with large datasets.
  • Complexity
    XSLT has its own syntax that may require a separate learning curve for developers familiar only with JavaScript and HTML, potentially increasing development time.
  • Limited Error Handling
    XSLT lacks robust error handling capabilities, which might make debugging and handling transformation errors more challenging.
  • Inconsistent Browser Support
    While generally supported, XSLT features can behave inconsistently across different browser versions, requiring additional testing and validation.
  • Security Concerns
    Processing XML in the browser might introduce security risks such as exposing internal data structures or vulnerabilities related to XML external entities (XXE).

EJS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages of EJS

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

XSLT in-browser implementation videos

No XSLT in-browser implementation videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

EJS videos

+ Add

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to XSLT in-browser implementation and EJS)

XSLT in-browser implementation

EJS

Development
35 35%
Development
65% 65
Javascript UI Libraries
24 24%
Javascript UI Libraries
76% 76
Front-End Frameworks
36 36%
Front-End Frameworks
64% 64
Website Localization
100 100%
Website Localization
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using XSLT in-browser implementation and EJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, EJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

XSLT in-browser implementation mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of XSLT in-browser implementation yet. Tracking of XSLT in-browser implementation recommendations started around Mar 2021.

EJS mentions (26)

  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How to Build an Application With Node.js
    We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Getting to the meat and potatoes of serverless recipe parsing with Amazon Bedrock
    The tags is where you put the HTML you want Claude to read. The <%- document %> contained within is an ejs placeholder. More on this shortly. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing XSLT in-browser implementation and EJS, you can also consider the following products

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...

Vash - Vash is a template engine that offers a swift flow between code and content using Razor Syntax

FLAVE - Flave was created to bring ASP.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Pugjs - Pugjs is an online platform that manages programming in the best way with powerful tools.

Loading...