Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

xmllint VS GCC C Preprocessor (cpp)

Compare xmllint VS GCC C Preprocessor (cpp) and see what are their differences

xmllint logo xmllint

command line XML tool

GCC C Preprocessor (cpp) logo GCC C Preprocessor (cpp)

Top (The C Preprocessor)
  • xmllint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-16
  • GCC C Preprocessor (cpp) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-05

xmllint features and specs

  • Validation
    xmllint can be used to validate XML documents against a DTD, which helps ensure the XML structure adheres to a predefined specification.
  • XPath Support
    It offers the ability to evaluate XPath expressions, which allows users to query specific parts of the XML document efficiently.
  • Format and Beautify
    xmllint can reformat XML documents to make them more readable, which is especially helpful for debugging and reviewing code.
  • Wide Compatibility
    As part of the libxml2 project, xmllint is compatible with various systems and supports a wide range of XML standards, making it versatile for different environments.
  • Command-line Usage
    Being a command-line tool, xmllint can be easily scripted and used in automated processes or integrated into development pipelines.

Possible disadvantages of xmllint

  • Complexity for Large Documents
    Handling very large XML documents can be computationally intensive, and xmllint might struggle with performance or memory usage in such cases.
  • Limited Error Descriptions
    Error messages produced by xmllint may not always be detailed, which can make debugging difficult for users without extensive XML knowledge.
  • No XML Schema Validation
    While xmllint supports DTD validation, it does not offer native support for validating XML Schema, which limits its applicability for XML documents based on XML Schema definitions.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with command-line tools may find xmllint challenging to use initially due to its text-based interface and wide range of options.
  • Limited Interactive Use
    Unlike some graphical XML tools, xmllint does not provide an interactive user interface, which may not appeal to users preferring visual tools for working with XML.

GCC C Preprocessor (cpp) features and specs

  • Macro Substitution
    The C Preprocessor allows for macros to be defined, which can simplify code maintenance by enabling code reuse and reducing complexity through symbolic representation.
  • Conditional Compilation
    It enables parts of the code to be compiled conditionally, which is useful for compiling platform-specific code or including/excluding debugging information.
  • File Inclusion
    The preprocessor supports file inclusion, which allows for a modular design by including header files containing declarations, thus promoting code organization and reuse.
  • Code Abstraction
    Preprocessors can help in abstracting away complex code structures, making code more readable and manageable.

Possible disadvantages of GCC C Preprocessor (cpp)

  • Complex Debugging
    Preprocessor usage can make debugging difficult because errors in the macro-processed code may not be evident from the source code, requiring additional steps to trace.
  • Limited Error Checking
    The preprocessor lacks the ability to perform type checking or evaluation of macro parameters, leading to potential logical errors that are only caught at compile-time or runtime.
  • Overuse Issues
    Excessive use of macros can lead to code that is hard to read and maintain, as the original code structure becomes obscured by macro expansions.
  • No Namespacing
    The preprocessor does not support namespaces, which can lead to name collisions in large projects, especially when macros are used extensively.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to xmllint and GCC C Preprocessor (cpp))
Programming Language
47 47%
53% 53
OOP
45 45%
55% 55
Note Taking
43 43%
57% 57
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using xmllint and GCC C Preprocessor (cpp). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, xmllint seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

xmllint mentions (2)

  • Generate RSS feeds with grep(1), sed(1), and Awk(1)
    I strongly recommend adding a schema validator to anything that generates XML. ATOM¹ has a nice schema available² that you can use at the end to check the whole thing (I use xmllint³, since it is in a lot of package repositories). Another nice thing about ATOM compared to RSS is that it has the xml:base attribute, which means you do not need to rewrite relative URLs into absolute ones. You can use recode's⁴... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • looking for html beautifier
    There is also pup. Or if you want to go with a lot more options with xmllint. Of if you want just to render the html in your terminal. Source: about 4 years ago

GCC C Preprocessor (cpp) mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GCC C Preprocessor (cpp) yet. Tracking of GCC C Preprocessor (cpp) recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing xmllint and GCC C Preprocessor (cpp), you can also consider the following products

XMLStarlet - XMLStarlet Command Line XML Toolkit

PP - A generic Preprocessor - P is a text preprocessor designed for Pandoc (and more generally Markdown and reStructuredText).

Xidel - Xidel is a command line tool to download html/xml pages and extract data from them using CSS 3 selectors, XPath 3 expressions or pattern-matching templates.

GNU M4 - GNU M4 is an implementation of the m4 macro preprocessor.

GPP - GPP is a general-purpose preprocessor with customizable syntax, suitable for a wide range of...

GNU sed - sed (stream editor) is a Unix utility that parses text and implements a programming language which...