Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

XML Copy Editor VS JSON Web Token

Compare XML Copy Editor VS JSON Web Token and see what are their differences

Insightful.io
The #1 monitoring employee software for clear insights into how your team works. Get real-time and historical data. Understand productivity at every level. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

XML Copy Editor logo XML Copy Editor

XML Copy Editor is a fast, free, validating XML editor.

JSON Web Token logo JSON Web Token

JSON Web Tokens are an open, industry standard RFC 7519 method for representing claims securely between two parties.
  • XML Copy Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-12
  • JSON Web Token Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19

XML Copy Editor features and specs

  • Open Source
    XML Copy Editor is open source, which means it is available for free and allows users to modify and distribute the software according to their needs.
  • Validation
    It offers validation support for XML against DTDs and XML schemas, ensuring that the XML documents are properly structured and error-free.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The editor provides a straightforward and easy-to-navigate interface, which is ideal for beginners and experienced users alike.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    XML Copy Editor is compatible with multiple operating systems including Windows and Linux, offering versatility to users across different platforms.
  • XSLT Support
    It includes support for XSLT, allowing transformations of XML documents into other formats.

Possible disadvantages of XML Copy Editor

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more advanced XML editors like Oxygen XML Editor, XML Copy Editor can be limited in functionalities, which might not meet the needs of all professional users.
  • Outdated UI
    The user interface, while functional, may appear dated compared to modern software, which could impact usability and appeal.
  • Lack of Active Development
    The software does not have frequent updates or active development, which might lead to issues with bug fixes or support for newer XML technologies.
  • Windows Focus
    Although it is cross-platform, the primary focus seems to be on the Windows version, which may result in less optimized experiences on other operating systems.
  • Limited File Format Support
    Support is focused on XML, and it offers limited compatibility with other file formats, which might be a drawback for users working with diverse data types.

JSON Web Token features and specs

  • Stateless
    Since JWTs are self-contained, they do not require server-side sessions, enabling stateless authentication and reducing server memory usage.
  • Scalability
    JWTs can easily be used in distributed systems and microservices architectures due to their stateless nature, facilitating horizontal scaling.
  • Decentralized Issuance
    Multiple issuers can create and sign their own tokens, allowing for more decentralized and flexible authentication mechanisms.
  • Performance
    JWTs eliminate the need for database lookups during authenticating requests, as the token contains all the necessary information, which can lead to performance improvements.
  • Cross-domain and Mobile Compatible
    JWTs are widely supported by different platforms and can easily be used in cross-domain situations and with mobile applications.
  • Security
    JWTs can be signed and optionally encrypted, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of the data they carry.

Possible disadvantages of JSON Web Token

  • Size
    JWTs tend to be larger than session IDs, which can increase the amount of data transmitted during requests.
  • Expiration Handling
    Managing token expiration can be complex. Once a token is issued, it remains valid until it expires or is explicitly revoked.
  • No Built-in Revocation
    Unlike sessions, JWTs cannot be easily revoked server-side, making it difficult to immediately invalidate tokens without additional mechanisms.
  • Security Risks
    If a JWT is intercepted or compromised, it can be used until it expires. Thus, it should be properly secured and transmitted over HTTPS.
  • Token Overhead
    Embedding too much information in the token payload can lead to performance overhead and potential data exposure risks.
  • Complexity
    Implementing JWT correctly requires a thorough understanding of security practices and token lifecycle management, which can add complexity to the system.

Analysis of JSON Web Token

Overall verdict

  • JWT is a widely-accepted standard used for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. It is a good choice for scenarios where security and scalability are primary concerns. However, it also requires careful implementation to ensure security, especially when dealing with sensitive information.

Why this product is good

  • JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact, URL-safe means of representing claims to be transferred between two parties. The claims in a JWT are encoded as a JSON object that is used as the payload of a JSON Web Signature (JWS) structure or as the plaintext of a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) structure, enabling the claims to be digitally signed or integrity protected with a Message Authentication Code (MAC) and/or encrypted.

Recommended for

  • Stateless authentication
  • Distributed systems
  • Microservices architecture
  • Applications needing scalable, self-contained access tokens
  • Browser-based applications

XML Copy Editor videos

No XML Copy Editor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

JSON Web Token videos

+ Add

JSON Web Tokens Suck - Randall Degges (DevNet Create 2018)

More videos:

  • Review - JSON Web Tokens with Public Key Signatures
  • Review - RFC 7519 JSON Web Token (JWT), Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to XML Copy Editor and JSON Web Token)

XML Copy Editor

JSON Web Token

Task Management
100 100%
Task Management
0% 0
Identity Provider
0 0%
Identity Provider
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
Identity And Access Management
0 0%
Identity And Access Management
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using XML Copy Editor and JSON Web Token. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JSON Web Token seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 303 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

XML Copy Editor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of XML Copy Editor yet. Tracking of XML Copy Editor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

JSON Web Token mentions (303)

  • Access and Refresh Token Explained
    The key aspect of the separation between access and refresh tokens lies in the possibility of making access tokens easy to validate. An access token that carries a signature (such as a signed JWT) may be validated by the resource server on its own, without needing to contact the authorization server. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
  • OAuth 2.0 Overview: How It Works and Why It Matters
    Access Token: A string representing the authorization granted to the client. It’s used by the client to access protected resources on the resource server. Access tokens are typically short-lived for security reasons (e.g., valid for an hour). They can be in various formats, with JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) being a popular choice. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
  • OAuth or JWT? Everything Developers Need to Know in 2025
    ​Security Considerations • JWT o Always use HTTPS to prevent token interception o Set short expiration times o Avoid storing sensitive data in the token • OAuth o Always validate redirect URIs o Implement proper token revocation o Consider using PKCE for public clients References • The Ultimate Guide to Implementing Authentication in JavaScript Applications • OAuth 2.0 – RFC 6749 • JWT.io –... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Guide to JWT API Authentication
    Jwt.io is a great playground to get used to working with JWTs. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Verifying Cognito access tokens - Comparing three JWT packages for Lambda authorizers
    The Lambda authorizer code decodes and verifies the token, and its business logic determines whether the request should proceed to the backend or be denied. Cognito access tokens are JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), and to simplify our coding, we might opt for an external package to handle token verification. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing XML Copy Editor and JSON Web Token, you can also consider the following products

Altova XMLSpy - The XMLSpy XML Editor is a powerful tool for editing XML and related technologies. It is the only XML Editor with patented SmartFix validation, enterprise-grade editors, converters, debuggers, and code generators.

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

Oxygen XML Editor - Oxygen XML Editor provides a comprehensive suite of XML authoring and development tools.

Firebase Authentication - Application and Data, Application Utilities, and User Management and Authentication

Liquid Studio - XML Tools Provider: XML Studio - Graphical XML Schema Editor.

Spring Security - The Spring portfolio has many projects, including Spring Framework, Spring IO Platform, Spring Cloud, Spring Boot, Spring Data, Spring Security...

Loading...