Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Xfce-Terminal VS CVS (Concurrent Versions System)

Compare Xfce-Terminal VS CVS (Concurrent Versions System) and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Xfce-Terminal logo Xfce-Terminal

Terminal is a modern terminal emulator for the Unix/Linux desktop - primarily for the Xfce desktop...

CVS (Concurrent Versions System) logo CVS (Concurrent Versions System)

CVS is a centralized version control system, an important component of Source Configuration...
  • Xfce-Terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21
  • CVS (Concurrent Versions System) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-23

Xfce-Terminal features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Xfce-Terminal is designed to be lightweight, which makes it fast and responsive, even on older hardware.
  • Customizable Appearance
    Users can customize the appearance of the terminal, including font size, colors, and transparency settings.
  • Tabbed Interface
    It supports a tabbed interface, allowing users to manage multiple terminal sessions within a single window.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
    Xfce-Terminal allows the use of keyboard shortcuts, which enhances the user experience by enabling quick operations.
  • Compatibility
    Since it is part of the Xfce desktop environment, it integrates well with other Xfce applications and components.

Possible disadvantages of Xfce-Terminal

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some other terminal emulators, Xfce-Terminal may lack advanced features such as built-in split panes or advanced session management.
  • Less Community Support
    Being less popular than some major terminal emulators, it might have less community support and fewer extensions or plugins available.
  • Basic UI
    While functional, the user interface is quite basic and may not appeal to users who prefer more visually enriched applications.
  • Dependent on Xfce Libraries
    Although it can run on other environments, it pulls in Xfce libraries, which might not be preferred by users trying to minimize dependencies.

CVS (Concurrent Versions System) features and specs

  • Wide Adoption and Mature
    CVS has been around for a long time, making it a mature version control system with a large user base. This means extensive documentation and community support are available.
  • Simplicity
    CVS is relatively simple to use, which makes it suitable for projects that do not require complex version control features.
  • Compatibility
    CVS is compatible with many legacy systems and can be easily integrated into older development workflows.
  • Client-Server Architecture
    CVS supports a client-server architecture, which allows for collaborative development across different teams and geographical locations.

Possible disadvantages of CVS (Concurrent Versions System)

  • Lack of Atomic Operations
    CVS does not support atomic commits, which means partial commits can occur if a commit process is interrupted, potentially leading to inconsistent repository states.
  • Poor Support for Renames and Moves
    CVS does not handle renaming or moving files efficiently, as it requires manual interventions to maintain the history of files.
  • Single Branch Development
    CVS has limited support for branch management, which can complicate the development of larger projects where robust branching strategies are required.
  • Limited Merge Capabilities
    Merging in CVS can be challenging due to its less sophisticated merge support compared to modern version control systems.
  • Lack of Security Features
    CVS has fewer built-in security features, which may not meet the needs of projects requiring stringent access control and encryption.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Xfce-Terminal and CVS (Concurrent Versions System))
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Xfce-Terminal and CVS (Concurrent Versions System). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Xfce-Terminal and CVS (Concurrent Versions System), you can also consider the following products

Kitty terminal - Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

WindTerm - WindTerm is a terminal emulator application that is used in cross-platforms such as SSH, Sftp, Shell, Telnet, and serial terminal and allows you to use the mouse to conduct any operation on its interface.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

ST - Simple Terminal - st is a simple terminal implementation for X.

Apache Subversion - Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.