Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

xACT VS XRECODE

Compare xACT VS XRECODE and see what are their differences

xACT logo xACT

xACT stands for X Audio Compression Toolkit.

XRECODE logo XRECODE

XRECODE can convert multiple audio files in parallel by taking full advantage of multi-core CPU.
  • xACT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-10
  • XRECODE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-22

xACT features and specs

  • Feature Rich
    xACT provides a comprehensive set of tools for working with lossless audio files, including decoding, encoding, and metadata editing.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    It offers a straightforward and intuitive interface that is accessible for both beginners and advanced users, making audio file conversion and editing simple.
  • Free to Use
    xACT is available free of charge, providing a cost-effective solution for users who need robust audio conversion and editing tools.
  • Active Maintenance
    The software continues to receive updates, ensuring compatibility with new audio file formats and operating system versions.

Possible disadvantages of xACT

  • MacOS Only
    xACT is only available for MacOS, which limits its use for those using other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    While it covers the basics well, xACT might lack some advanced features present in specialized or professional audio editing software.
  • Community Support
    As a free tool, xACT might rely more on community support rather than a dedicated support team, which could be a limitation for resolving specific user issues.

XRECODE features and specs

  • Wide Format Support
    XRECODE supports a variety of audio formats like MP3, WAV, FLAC, and more, making it highly versatile for different conversion needs.
  • Batch Conversion
    The software allows for batch conversion, enabling users to convert multiple files simultaneously and saving a significant amount of time.
  • High Conversion Speed
    XRECODE is known for its high speed in converting audio files, providing efficiency for users who need quick results.
  • Multi-core Utilization
    XRECODE can utilize multiple CPU cores, allowing for faster conversion processes, especially useful for larger files or bulk conversions.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The software features a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users of all levels to navigate and utilize its features.
  • Command Line Support
    XRECODE offers command line support, which is beneficial for advanced users who need scripting capabilities for automated workflows.

Possible disadvantages of XRECODE

  • Cost
    XRECODE is a paid software, which might not be ideal for users looking for free alternatives.
  • Windows Only
    The software is available only for Windows operating systems, which limits its accessibility for users on macOS or Linux.
  • Basic Editing Features
    XRECODE offers limited audio editing features compared to other specialized audio editing software, making it less suitable for detailed audio editing tasks.
  • No Cloud Integration
    The lack of cloud integration means users cannot easily convert files directly from or to cloud storage services like Google Drive or Dropbox.
  • Interface Design
    While functional, the user interface design is considered outdated by some users, which might affect the overall user experience.

xACT videos

WP XACT PRO FORK REVIEW NEW!!

XRECODE videos

The Best Sound Recording Software Free Download Audacity Xrecode Wavosaur Review

More videos:

  • Review - Tutorial Xrecode II
  • Review - xrecode II - Audio Converter - Programmvorstellung

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to xACT and XRECODE)
Product Presentation
26 26%
74% 74
Video
19 19%
81% 81
Audio & Music
20 20%
80% 80
Audio Player
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using xACT and XRECODE. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, XRECODE should be more popular than xACT. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

xACT mentions (6)

  • Useful built-in macOS command-line utilities
    > afconvert See also XACT[1]. It's a macOS GUI, but it's nerd-friendly. [1] http://xact.scottcbrown.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Converting FLAC files to ALAC to play on Apple Music, macOS, how?
    I suggest xACT (http://xact.scottcbrown.org/), that is actually a GUI for a bunch of open source applications. Easy to use and it just works. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Need Suggestions For an Audio File Converter on Mojave?
    I use xACT for most of my audio needs. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Help to digitalize my CD collection
    Did the same on my Mac years ago: 1) ALAC, 2) XLD or xACT (http://xact.scottcbrown.org), 3) Apple USB CD (if you can find it somewhere). Source: about 3 years ago
  • Plexamp Desktop Playback Issue / Bug?
    Hmm. If you're on Mac maybe try xACT. My process is copy the AIFF files directly from the disc in Finder to my desktop and then drag those into the app in the encode tab with Apple Lossless checked for ALAC. Haven't had an issue since I've been doing it that way. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

XRECODE mentions (11)

  • For those who've recently switched from Windows to Mac, what's the one app you miss the most?
    Xrecode III, as a companion to my music player, for splitting with .cue files and (sometimes) converting between formats. The next best alternative seems to be fre:ac, but fre:ac is not quite good. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How can I convert flac files to opus and have all metadata(title, album, artist tags) plus embedded image to transfer to the target file? I just can't get it to work.
    Https://xrecode.com/ should be able to do it is you can use it free for 30 days. I have used this program to convert 150k FLACs to 500kbps OGG and they sound really good. I like this audio converter so much I bought a copy of the newest version. Source: about 2 years ago
  • My father recently passed away from cancer and left behind a large music collection.
    Just letting you know all of these CDs ripper to FLAC would take of 6tb to 8tb if you roll with 500kbps OGG it would take up 4.5tb to 6tb. If you want to rip 100 to 300 CDs yourself use this program https://xrecode.com/ it is so worth the price rip them to 500kbps OGG they will sound just fine. I have 155k tracks all at 500kbps OGG and they sound fine to me. Most people will never hear the difference between... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Any recommendations for a program that can turn FLAC to OGG while retaining all metadata?
    This program works nicely https://xrecode.com/ I have converted like 155k FLACs to OGG with it. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What's the best way to convert FLAC to Opus?
    Https://xrecode.com/ this program is nice I have used it convert 50k FLACs to 500kbps OGG. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing xACT and XRECODE, you can also consider the following products

X Lossless Decoder - X Lossless Decoder (XLD) is a tool for Mac OS X that is able to decode/convert/play various...

fre:ac - fre:ac is a audio converter and CD extractor designed for Microsoft Windows, Mac OS and Linux, distributed under the GNU General Public License.

LameXP - LameXP is an Audio Encoder Front-End, a graphical user-interface for a number of audio encoders.

Exact Audio Copy - Exact Audio Copy is a so called audio grabber for CDs using standard CD and DVD-ROM drives. The main differences. DownloadDownload the latest version of EAC Advertisement / Anzeige .

Flacon - Flacon extracts individual tracks from one big audio file containing the entire album of music and...

Sound Juicer - Sound Juicer is a clean, mean, and lean CD ripper for GNOME 2.