wrk VS PloyRef

wrk

HTTP benchmarking tool capable of generating significant load on a multi-core CPU.

PloyRef

Automated employee reference checking

Landing page //
2023-07-28

Landing page //
2022-02-13

wrk features and specs

High Performance
wrk is able to generate significant load, making it suitable for testing how a web server performs under stress.
Ease of Use
The command-line interface of wrk is straightforward, allowing users to quickly set up and execute tests with minimal configuration.
Lua Scripting Support
wrk supports Lua scripting, which allows users to customize requests and extend testing functionalities beyond basic HTTP requests.
Open Source
Being open source, wrk is freely available for use and modification, and it benefits from community contributions and feedback.
Multi-threading
wrk is designed to take advantage of multi-threading, which helps in utilizing system resources efficiently for load testing.

Possible disadvantages of wrk

Limited Metrics
wrk provides basic metrics like latency and throughput, but it lacks built-in detailed analytical tools available in other performance testing tools.
No GUI
It is a command-line tool without a graphical user interface, which might be a barrier for non-technical users or those who prefer visual representations.
Scripting Complexity
While Lua scripting adds flexibility, it can also increase complexity, especially for users who are not familiar with Lua or programming.
Limited Protocol Support
wrk is primarily built for HTTP benchmarking, and it does not natively support other protocols such as WebSocket or gRPC.
No Distributed Testing
wrk does not support distributed load testing out-of-the-box, limiting its effectiveness in simulating geographically distributed traffic.

PloyRef features and specs

Comprehensive Reference Management
PloyRef offers a robust system for managing employment references, streamlining the process of securing and verifying references for job applicants.
User-Friendly Interface
The platform provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, allowing users to navigate and utilize its features with minimal learning curve.
Time Efficiency
By digitizing and automating the reference check process, PloyRef saves significant time for HR professionals and recruiters.
Enhanced Security
PloyRef ensures that sensitive data, such as employee references, is handled securely, protecting both the candidate's and the company's information.

Possible disadvantages of PloyRef

Limited Integration
PloyRef might have limited compatibility with certain HR systems or applicant tracking systems, which could require additional steps for integration.
Subscription Costs
There may be costs associated with using PloyRef, making it less ideal for smaller companies with limited budgets.
Dependence on Technology
Relying on an online platform for reference management means that users are dependent on the availability and functionality of the software and internet connection.
Learning Curve for Some Users
Despite its user-friendliness, some users, particularly those less familiar with digital tools, may require time to become accustomed to the platform’s features.

wrk videos

+ Add

WRK Core Collection Line Review

PloyRef videos

No PloyRef videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to wrk and PloyRef)

PloyRef

Hiring And Recruitment

50 50%

Hiring And Recruitment

50% 50

Monitoring Tools

100 100%

Monitoring Tools

0% 0

0 0%

100% 100

Website Testing

100 100%

Website Testing

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using wrk and PloyRef. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, wrk seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 30 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

wrk mentions (30)

Bombardier: Fast cross-platform HTTP benchmarking tool written in Go
Cool, I didn't see this tool before. I have tried most open source load testing tools out there, as part of writing a couple of review articles on them (https://grafana.com/blog/2020/03/03/open-source-load-testing-tool-review/) and my gut reaction is this one looks like a Golang alternative to Wrk (https://github.com/wg/wrk) in that its main feature is speed. I'd bet Wrk... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
"Free WAF" SafeLine Performance Testing
Wrk: A straightforward HTTP benchmarking utility for putting web servers through their paces. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Running a Billion Workflows a month with Netflix Conductor
We used wrk2, a fantastic tool to generate stable load on the server. Wrk2 improves on wrk and adds the ability to generate sustained load at a specific rate (-R parameter). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
So how does WSGI concurrency work?
I am using a tool called wrk to make a bunch of requests to my website, and changing the concurrency of the requests drastically changes the result, with concurrency set to 1, I get 894 requests made in 10 seconds, and when I set concurrency to 10, I get 8549 requests. This linear scaling stops when increasing the concurrency more drastically (18805 requests for 100 and 19814 for 500 concurrency). Source: about 2 years ago
TcpSocket read error (with wrk)
Im creating multithreaded async http server for learning purposes and I'm facing problem when benchmarking with wrk. I get socket read errors on every connection:. Source: about 2 years ago