Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WritePHPOnline.Com VS Enzyme

Compare WritePHPOnline.Com VS Enzyme and see what are their differences

WritePHPOnline.Com logo WritePHPOnline.Com

WritePHPOnline.Com is an online site that enables you to write code in PHP and view its output.

Enzyme logo Enzyme

Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.
  • WritePHPOnline.Com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-01
  • Enzyme Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16

WritePHPOnline.Com features and specs

  • Immediate Execution
    WritePHPOnline.Com allows users to execute PHP code instantly in a web-based environment, which is useful for testing and experimentation.
  • Ease of Use
    The interface is straightforward and user-friendly, making it accessible for beginners to test and learn PHP.
  • No Installation Required
    Users can write and run PHP code without needing to install any software on their local machine, saving time and effort.
  • Accessibility
    Being an online platform, it is accessible from any device with an internet connection and a web browser.

Possible disadvantages of WritePHPOnline.Com

  • Limited Functionality
    The platform may not support all PHP functions and extensions, which could be limiting for more advanced users or applications.
  • Security Concerns
    Running PHP code on an online platform can raise security issues, especially if sensitive data is involved.
  • Performance Constraints
    Performance might be slower compared to running PHP scripts on a local or server environment, especially for complex or resource-intensive scripts.
  • Internet Dependency
    Users need a stable internet connection to access and use the platform, which can be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.

Enzyme features and specs

  • Shallow Rendering
    Allows you to render a component without its children, which speeds up tests and isolates the component being tested.
  • Rich API
    Provides a comprehensive set of APIs that enable deep rendering, traversing, and manipulating of components, making it flexible and powerful for various testing needs.
  • Compatibility with Mocha and Jest
    Easily integrates with popular testing frameworks like Mocha and Jest, ensuring a smooth setup process.
  • Simulate Events
    Supports simulation of user events such as clicks, enabling more realistic interaction testing.
  • Selector Support
    Allows for selecting and finding elements using CSS selectors or component constructors, making it easier to target specific elements in tests.
  • Active Community
    Has a large and active community, which can be a valuable resource for support, plugins, and best practices.

Possible disadvantages of Enzyme

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for beginners, requiring additional libraries and configurations.
  • Limited Support for New React Features
    Often lags behind in supporting new React features, such as Hooks or the latest Context API, compared to other testing frameworks.
  • Deprecation Warnings
    Issues with deprecation warnings and updates can arise, causing frustrations during maintenance and upgrades.
  • Performance Overhead
    Can be slower compared to other testing libraries, especially when using deep rendering for large components.
  • Inconsistent API
    Some users find the API inconsistent or unintuitive, requiring more effort to learn and use effectively.

Analysis of Enzyme

Overall verdict

  • Enzyme is generally considered a good tool for testing React applications, especially among developers familiar with its API. However, it is worth noting that there has been a shift towards using React Testing Library, which has gained popularity for its focus on testing the application as users would interact with it.

Why this product is good

  • Enzyme is a popular JavaScript testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output. It provides methods for rendering components, interacting with them, and testing their lifecycle methods, which are essential for writing comprehensive tests for your React applications.

Recommended for

    Enzyme is recommended for developers who are working on React applications and prefer a testing library that provides a more detailed inspection of component internals, or for those maintaining legacy codebases that already rely on Enzyme. If you value testing that emphasizes implementation details, Enzyme can be a good choice.

WritePHPOnline.Com videos

No WritePHPOnline.Com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Enzyme videos

Enzymes (Updated)

More videos:

  • Review - Enzymes
  • Review - Over-the-Counter Enzyme Supplements Explained: Mayo Clinic Physician Explains Pros, Cons

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WritePHPOnline.Com and Enzyme)
Development
70 70%
30% 30
Developer Tools
28 28%
72% 72
Online Services
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using WritePHPOnline.Com and Enzyme. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Enzyme seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WritePHPOnline.Com mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WritePHPOnline.Com yet. Tracking of WritePHPOnline.Com recommendations started around Mar 2022.

Enzyme mentions (3)

  • Top React Testing Libraries in 2025
    Enzyme is a widely-used testing utility that provides robust tools for interacting with and inspecting React components. Its API supports shallow, full, and static rendering, enabling developers to test components in isolation or with their child components. Enzyme also allows testing lifecycle methods, making it ideal for applications with complex state and props interactions. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How we have managed to run Enzyme tests with React 18 app.
    Like many other companies with mature software, we found ourselves at a crossroads with our React application. The app, initially developed in early 2019, was built with React 16 and used Enzyme for unit testing. Over the past five years, the app grew, evolved, gained new features, and went though minor and major refactorings. Obviously, as responsible engineers we always maintained unit test coverage around... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • What would you consider to be a must for a modern 2022 dev stack?
    React testing library instead of enzyme for testing react UIs. I'll never go back. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WritePHPOnline.Com and Enzyme, you can also consider the following products

PHPTester.net - PHPTester.net gives developers and learners the ability to write their PHP code and get the output online.

Ava - Making conversations accessible for the deaf

PHPCodeChecker - PHPCodeChecker is a best-in-class service that enables developers and PHP programmers to write their code online and analyze it.

react-testing-library - [`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding

Paiza.io - Paiza.io allows you to write and run code in many languages.

EyeJS - A JavaScript testing framework for the real world.