Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Wrike VS Apache Subversion

Compare Wrike VS Apache Subversion and see what are their differences

Zoho Projects
Turn every Project into a Success Story with Zoho Projects featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Wrike logo Wrike

Wrike is a flexible, scalable, and easy-to-use collaborative work management software that helps high-performance teams organize and accomplish their work. Try it now.

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • Wrike Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-13
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Wrike features and specs

  • Comprehensive Task Management
    Wrike offers robust tools for task management such as Gantt charts, Kanban boards, and customizable workflows, enabling teams to efficiently manage and track their tasks and projects.
  • Collaboration Features
    Wrike includes a variety of collaboration features like real-time activity streams, document sharing, and @mentions to facilitate team communication and collaboration.
  • Customizable Dashboards
    Users can create and customize dashboards to fit their needs, providing an organized view of their tasks, projects, and key performance indicators at a glance.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Wrike integrates with numerous third-party applications, including Google Drive, Slack, and Microsoft Office, enabling seamless workflow and data integration.
  • Time Tracking
    The platform offers built-in time tracking, allowing team members to log hours spent on various tasks and projects, which is useful for project management and billing purposes.

Possible disadvantages of Wrike

  • Learning Curve
    Wrike has a steep learning curve, especially for new users or those unfamiliar with project management software, which can require significant time and training to master.
  • Pricing
    Wrike's pricing can be quite high, particularly for small businesses or startups, with costs increasing as more features and users are added.
  • Complexity of Advanced Features
    While Wrike offers many advanced features, some users find them overly complex and difficult to utilize effectively without extensive training or experience.
  • User Interface
    Some users find Wrike's user interface to be cluttered and not as intuitive as they would like, which can slow down navigation and increase the time needed to complete tasks.
  • Limited Storage in Lower Plans
    Lower-tier plans come with limited storage options, which can be restrictive for teams needing to store large amounts of data or files within the platform.

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

Wrike videos

+ Add

Wrike Review, Features and Benefits Overview: Is it Still Worth Using in 2020?

More videos:

  • Review - Wrike Review | Online Project Management Tool | Pearl Lemon Reviews
  • Demo - Wrike Project Management Demo
  • Review - Wrike Review 2024 | Features, Pros & Cons, Who Should Use it
  • Review - Wrike Review: Top Features, Pros, And Cons
  • Tutorial - What Is Wrike? Pros, Cons, And How To Use in 2023

Apache Subversion videos

+ Add

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Wrike and Apache Subversion)

Wrike

Apache Subversion

Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100
Task Management
100 100%
Task Management
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Wrike and Apache Subversion. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Wrike and Apache Subversion

Wrike Reviews

The Top 7 ClickUp Alternatives You Need to Know in 2025
OverviewWrike stands out as a powerful project management tool that excels in custom workflows and real-time collaboration. It is particularly favored by larger organizations due to its scalability and extensive feature set.
Source: www.ledgerteams.com
25 Best Asana Alternatives & Competitors for Project Management in 2024
Wrike project management software is ideal for small agencies needing a customizable workspace to organize shared calendars, schedule projects, and collaborate with ease. What’s more, approvers can expedite feedback using Wrike’s visual markup tool.
Source: clickup.com
10+1 Best Workflow Management Software 2024 For Maximum Efficiency
Wrike shines with its comprehensive reporting capabilities and strong project management features. A downside could be its steep learning curve for new users. Wrike incorporates with numerous third-party systems, including SalesForce and Adobe Creative Cloud, and provides excellent automation facilities.
Source: www.manifest.ly
16 Best Asana Alternatives of 2024 (Free + Paid)
With all of those features, however, the software can be hard to learn and even more difficult to master. It can be a pain to onboard, especially for users with no project management experience. There’s a dashboard but it doesn’t have the ability to filter unwanted data. Wrike can also be slow to load and users have complained about its confusing UI. Before making a decision...
Source: www.projectmanager.com
Project Management vs Workflow Management — Wrike vs Pneumatic
Custom phases can be added. However, tasks are moved manually between them. Wrike errs on the side of flexibility, giving users a very powerful tool for creating and managing projects and tasks with them, but all the actual management has to be done by the users.
Source: www.pneumatic.app

Apache Subversion Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Subversion yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wrike seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Wrike mentions (1)

  • Identify which frontend NPM libraries are used on any website
    I just realized I can use this to see who is ignoring GDPR as well. Scanning a few sites I know I see a lot of tracking scripts load up right away. When I scan something like wrike.com I see good implementation of GDPR because the only thing loading is GTM / GA and trust arc as far as third-party libraries. Source: over 3 years ago

Apache Subversion mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Subversion yet. Tracking of Apache Subversion recommendations started around May 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Wrike and Apache Subversion, you can also consider the following products

Asana - Asana project management is an effort to re-imagine how we work together, through modern productivity software. Fast and versatile, Asana helps individuals and groups get more done.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Basecamp - A simple and elegant project management system.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

Loading...