Based on our record, arXiv seems to be a lot more popular than WordNet. While we know about 315 links to arXiv, we've tracked only 28 mentions of WordNet. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
TL;DR: The authors pretrain the model to classify images into Wordnet synsets[a] that appear in the caption, using a standard Cross Entropy loss. They keep the number of classes relatively small by removing any synsets that don't show up in captions at least 500 times in the dataset. It seems to work well. My immediate question is: Why not classify among the entire hierarchy of all Wordnet synsets? --- [a]... - Source: Hacker News / 27 days ago
To operationalize this intuition, the Microsoft and UC Berkeley researchers use WordNet and Wiktionary to augment the text in image-text pairs. The concept itself is augmented for isolated concepts, such as the class labels in ImageNet, whereas for captions (such as from GCC), the least common noun phrase is augmented. Equipped with this additional structured knowledge, contrastively pretrained models exhibit... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
If you like this, definitely check out WordNet (https://wordnet.princeton.edu/). - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I didn't understand well what you meant, but maybe this site can help you: https://wordnet.princeton.edu/. Source: over 1 year ago
What I'd do is work with a huge database like WordNet and then try to "extrapolate" BIP39 to 4096 words by creating queries against WordNet to obtain words meeting the constraints you'd like to keep. Source: over 1 year ago
I’m also curious about the role decentralized, open knowledge bases might play as a counterweight to AI-driven narrowing. Could initiatives like Wikidata, arXiv, or IPFS provide a bulwark against knowledge collapse by making marginal information more accessible? There’s lots of room for further work here. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Just read some AI papers on https://arxiv.org , that will give you an idea(but don't worry too much, they probably used some AI in the making of those papers, lol). But as soon the next generation of AI is out (the next step in AI), everything will change again. Source: 5 months ago
Prepublisher journals, or https://arxiv.org. Source: 5 months ago
Check out paperswithcode, scroll through arxiv, or browse some well-known conferences in the field (NeurIPS, ICML). Source: 6 months ago
I recently noticed that symplectic geometry has its own category on https://arxiv.org/, and generally after some quick research it looks like it's a very active field in math. Source: 7 months ago
VerbAce - VerbAce-Pro is an easy-to-use Desktop Translation Software. Translate in a mouse click
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
Artha - Artha is a handy thesaurus based on WordNet with distinct features like global hotkey look-up...
Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
WordWeb - One-click lookup in any almost any Windows program; Hundreds of thousands of definitions and synonyms; The latest international English words; Works offline, or reference to Wikipedia and web references.
Unpaywall - Legally read research papers behind paywalls.