Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Wolfram Mathematica VS Coq

Compare Wolfram Mathematica VS Coq and see what are their differences

Wolfram Mathematica logo Wolfram Mathematica

Mathematica has characterized the cutting edge in specialized processing—and gave the chief calculation environment to a large number of pioneers, instructors, understudies, and others around the globe.

Coq logo Coq

Coq is a proof assistant, which allows you to write mathematical proofs in a rigorous and formal...
  • Wolfram Mathematica Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-07
  • Coq Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17

Wolfram Mathematica videos

Introduction to Wolfram Notebooks

Coq videos

Ubiquinol CoQ-10 Supplement Review

More videos:

  • Review - Gumbenni listened to Sseth's review on Coq

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Wolfram Mathematica and Coq)
Technical Computing
98 98%
2% 2
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
Numerical Computation
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Wolfram Mathematica and Coq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Wolfram Mathematica and Coq

Wolfram Mathematica Reviews

10 Best MATLAB Alternatives [For Beginners and Professionals]
Wolfram Mathematica is packed with features that make your computations super-easy. Mathematica can handle any visualizations or plot with ease.
6 MATLAB Alternatives You Could Use
Deveoped by Wolfram Research, the pioneers of computational software, Mathematica comes with a truckload of features for all your mathematical computational needs. The latest version boasts over 700 new functions, as well as multiple function libraries and geo visualization/animation tools. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. From 2D/3D image processing to enhanced...
Source: beebom.com

Coq Reviews

We have no reviews of Coq yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Coq seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 46 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Wolfram Mathematica mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Wolfram Mathematica yet. Tracking of Wolfram Mathematica recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Coq mentions (46)

  • The First Stable Release of a Rust-Rewrite Sudo Implementation
    Are those more important than, say: - Proven with Coq, a formal proof management system: https://coq.inria.fr/ See in the real world: https://aws.amazon.com/security/provable-security/ And check out Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • In Which I Claim Rich Hickey Is Wrong
    Dafny and Whiley are two examples with explicit verification support. Idris and other dependently typed languages should all be rich enough to express the required predicate but might not necessarily be able to accept a reasonable implementation as proof. Isabelle, Lean, Coq, and other theorem provers definitely can express the capability but aren't going to churn out much in the way of executable programs;... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • If given a list of properties/definitions and relationship between them, could a machine come up with (mostly senseless, but) true implications?
    Still, there are many useful tools based on these ideas, used by programmers and mathematicians alike. What you describe sounds rather like Datalog (e.g. Soufflé Datalog), where you supply some rules and an initial fact, and the system repeatedly expands out the set of facts until nothing new can be derived. (This has to be finite, if you want to get anywhere.) In Prolog (e.g. SWI Prolog) you also supply a set of... Source: 10 months ago
  • Mark Petruska has requested 250000 Algos for the development of a Coq-avm library for AVM version 8
    Information about the Coq proof assistant: https://coq.inria.fr/ , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq. Source: 12 months ago
  • Basic SAT model of x86 instructions using Z3, autogenerated from Intel docs
    This type of thing can help you formally verify code. So, if your proof is correct, and your description of the (language/CPU) is correct, you can prove the code does what you think it does. Formal proof systems are still growing up, though, and they are still pretty hard to use. See Coq for an introduction: https://coq.inria.fr/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Wolfram Mathematica and Coq, you can also consider the following products

MATLAB - A high-level language and interactive environment for numerical computation, visualization, and programming

Agda - Agda is a dependently typed functional programming language. It has inductive families, i.e.

GNU Octave - GNU Octave is a programming language for scientific computing.

Isabelle - Isabelle is a proof assistant for writing and checking mathematical proofs by computer.

Scilab - Scilab Official Website. Enter your search in the box aboveAbout ScilabScilab is free and open source software for numerical . Thanks for downloading Scilab!

Idris - Programming, Programming Language, Learning Resources, Languages, and Frontend Development