Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WireMock VS HttpMaster

Compare WireMock VS HttpMaster and see what are their differences

WireMock logo WireMock

WireMock - a web service test double for all occasions.

HttpMaster logo HttpMaster

HttpMaster is a professional software tool for testing and debugging HTTP applications, primarily aimed at REST API applications and web services.
  • WireMock Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • HttpMaster Main window
    Main window //
    2024-06-13

Core HttpMaster features are: * HttpMaster project to store complete definition of API calls in one single place. * Broad set of http properties. * Dynamic parameters to simulate variations of input data or create global API values. * Response data validation with logical expressions. * Request chaining to use data from previous request with the next request. * Extensive data upload support, including 'multipart/form-data'. * Request data builder for creating request body with an optional dynamic parameters. * Request item execution with detailed progress monitoring. * Execution groups to create batches of requests. * Comprehensive execution data review and management. * Additional tools (basic request tool for ad-hoc execution, command line interface, OpenAPI import, etc).

WireMock features and specs

  • Flexible API Mocking
    WireMock allows developers to create a wide range of mock APIs, including simulating different behaviors and responses, which helps in testing edge cases and handling different scenarios without needing the actual service.
  • Standalone and Embeddable
    WireMock can be run as a standalone server or embedded into a Java application, providing versatility in how it can be integrated and used within various development environments.
  • Rich Feature Set
    WireMock offers features like request verification, fault injection, and response templating, which make it a powerful tool for replicating real-world service behavior in test environments.
  • Community and Documentation
    WireMock is supported by a large community and comprehensive documentation, making it easier to troubleshoot issues and integrate it effectively into development processes.

Possible disadvantages of WireMock

  • Java-Based Limitation
    WireMock is primarily a Java-based tool, which might not be ideal for teams not using Java, leading to additional setup and integration challenges for non-Java environments.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running WireMock, especially in complex scenarios or with a heavy load, can introduce performance overhead that might not be tolerable in all development environments, particularly in CI/CD pipelines.
  • Learning Curve
    Although WireMock is powerful, it has a steep learning curve for those unfamiliar with its configuration and usage, potentially requiring considerable time to become proficient.
  • Limited Non-Standard Protocols
    WireMock is primarily designed for HTTP-based services, and may not be suitable out-of-the-box for mocking services that use non-standard or proprietary protocols, thus limiting its applicability in some scenarios.

HttpMaster features and specs

  • HttpMaster project to store complete definition of API calls in one single place
  • Broad set of http properties
  • Dynamic parameters to simulate variations of input data or create global API values
  • Response data validation with logical expressions
  • Request chaining to use data from previous request with the next request
  • Extensive data upload support, including 'multipart/form-data'
  • Request data builder for creating request body with an optional dynamic parameters
  • Request item execution with detailed progress monitoring
  • Execution groups to create batches of requests
  • Comprehensive execution data review and management
  • Basic request tool
  • Command line interface
  • OpenAPI import
  • Prepare cURL commands

WireMock videos

WireMock stand-alone by Ixchel Ruiz

HttpMaster videos

Testing with HttpMaster 02

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Web Services Testing with HTTP Master

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WireMock and HttpMaster)
API Tools
44 44%
56% 56
Developer Tools
50 50%
50% 50
APIs
60 60%
40% 40
HTTP Proxies
100 100%
0% 0

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing WireMock and HttpMaster.

How would you describe your primary audience?

HttpMaster's answer:

Developers and testers.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

HttpMaster's answer:

  • Microsoft
  • Oracle
  • Google

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

HttpMaster's answer:

Performance, simple UI, resource friendly.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

HttpMaster's answer:

Microsoft .NET.

User comments

Share your experience with using WireMock and HttpMaster. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WireMock seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WireMock mentions (21)

  • The best way for testing outbound API calls
    Mocha is a lib inspired by nock and WireMock. It allows checking if the mock was called or not, which is a nice feature. Like httptest, it also it don't automatically intercept the requests. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Effective Strategies for Writing Unit Tests with External Dependencies like Databases and APIs
    For testing third-party API calls, you can use libraries such as WireMock or Nock. These tools allow you to simulate HTTP requests and responses, helping you test how your application behaves when interacting with an external service. For example, you can mock successful responses, simulate errors, or test timeouts, all without making real HTTP requests. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Best API Mocking Platforms in 2024
    WireMock is a versatile, open-source platform for API mocking, offering powerful simulation features for both HTTP and HTTPS protocols. It’s highly customizable and is especially well-suited for complex use cases, such as testing microservices architectures and handling advanced behaviors. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • 10 Best API Mocking Tools (2024 Review)
    WireMock is a Java-based library for stubbing and mocking web services. It allows conditional response setup, latency simulation, and HTTP traffic recording. WireMock is open-source and free, suitable for developers familiar with Java. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How To Test Integrations with APIs Using WireMock in .NET
    As we don't have other services running during integration testing - we need to somehow simulate these services. And here is where a WireMock library comes into play. WireMock allows mocking the APIs your service depends on. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

HttpMaster mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of HttpMaster yet. Tracking of HttpMaster recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WireMock and HttpMaster, you can also consider the following products

Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

MockServer - Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.

API Fortress - API performance, accuracy, and uptime testing. Without code.

Mockoon - Mockoon is the easiest and quickest way to design and run mock REST APIs. No remote deployment, no account required, free and open-source.

Mockable - Quickly define some REST or SOAP endpoints and have them return json/xml (dummy) data.