WireGuard
OpenVPN
ZeroTier
ProtonVPN
Hamachi
Tunnelblick
Psiphon
Tor Browser
LogMeIn Central
ESET Endpoint Security
Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Druva inSync
McAfee Endpoint Security
Panda Security
Rippling
WireGuard LogMeIn CentralAs an IT professional, I have been using LogMeIn Central for several months now to manage and monitor my organisation's endpoint infrastructure. Overall, I have found the software to be comprehensive in terms of its features, but average in terms of performance and advanced capabilities.
One of the standout features of LogMeIn Central is its wide range of capabilities for endpoint management. From remote control and asset management to patch management and software deployment, this software offers a range of tools that are useful for IT professionals. I particularly appreciated the security features, such as password protection and two-factor authentication, which help to protect against unauthorised access.
However, while LogMeIn Central is relatively easy to use and offers a user-friendly interface, I did experience some performance issues. The software can be slow at times, particularly when attempting to access remote devices, which can be frustrating. Additionally, while the software offers a good range of features, it lacks some advanced capabilities that are offered by other endpoint management solutions, such as advanced reporting and analytics.
In terms of pricing, LogMeIn Central is somewhat expensive compared to other endpoint management software on the market. While it may be worth the investment for larger organisations with more complex endpoint infrastructure, smaller businesses may find it too costly.
Based on our record, WireGuard seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Wireguard. Wireguard uses UDP only and runs TCP sockets over UDP. Source: about 1 year ago
Look at Wireguard. I know you don't want Yet Another VPN running alongside your IPSec, but it's less VPN and more encrypted point-to-point UDP. You can set it up on any port you wish, including common ports that might be open on an outbound smart firewall not doing deep packet inspection. That way, it can stay out of the way of your existing IPSec deployment. Source: about 1 year ago
We use Elixir/Erlang for our control plane, and Rust for our data plane, built on the excellent WireGuard® tunneling protocol. Source: about 1 year ago
Both products are based off Wireguard which is available for all new linux distributions. https://wireguard.com . I'm not saying OP's solution is wrong, just curious what the advantages are. Other than potentially simpler client setup, what are the advantages of paying for tailscale. With the opensource tailscale, I'm not sure if you get access to an api you can use to look up the hosts. Source: about 1 year ago
Noise Protocol Framework (used by Wireguard). Source: about 1 year ago
OpenVPN - OpenVPN - The Open Source VPN
ESET Endpoint Security - ESET internet security solutions deliver proactive, multi-layered protection, including antivirus, anti-phishing, exploit blocker and more, to protect the business from all known and emerging malware and threats.
ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN
Symantec Endpoint Encryption - Symantec Endpoint Encryption protects the sensitive information and ensure regulatory compliance with strong full-disk and removable media encryption with centralized management.
ProtonVPN - ProtonVPN is a security focused FREE VPN service, developed by CERN and MIT scientists. Use the web anonymously, unblock websites & encrypt your connection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security - Our HuMachine™-based, Next Generation endpoint security delivers multi-layered protection for multiple platforms – including Linux servers and endpoints – to detect suspicious behavior and block threats, including ransomware.
