Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WireGuard VS Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compare WireGuard VS Symantec Endpoint Encryption and see what are their differences

WireGuard logo WireGuard

Fast, Modern, Secure VPN Tunnel

Symantec Endpoint Encryption logo Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Symantec Endpoint Encryption protects the sensitive information and ensure regulatory compliance with strong full-disk and removable media encryption with centralized management.
  • WireGuard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-24
  • Symantec Endpoint Encryption Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-08

WireGuard features and specs

  • Simplicity
    WireGuard is noted for its simplicity in terms of codebase and configuration, making it easier to understand, audit, and maintain.
  • Performance
    WireGuard offers high performance, low latency, and minimal overhead, which results in faster connections compared to other VPN protocols.
  • Security
    WireGuard uses state-of-the-art cryptographic protocols and algorithms, providing a high level of security.
  • Cross-Platform
    WireGuard is compatible with many operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android.
  • Modern Design
    Designed with modern networking use-cases in mind, WireGuard supports advanced features like roaming and easier NAT traversal.
  • Efficient Codebase
    With approximately 4,000 lines of code, WireGuard's minimalism reduces the attack surface and potential for vulnerabilities.

Possible disadvantages of WireGuard

  • Limited Features
    WireGuard primarily focuses on being a secure VPN protocol and lacks some advanced features found in other protocols.
  • Still Evolving
    As a relatively new technology, WireGuard may still undergo significant changes and improvements, which could impact stability and support.
  • Static IP Assignment
    WireGuard assigns static IP addresses to each peer, which can be less flexible compared to dynamic IP allocation in other VPN solutions.
  • Server Compatibility
    Some legacy infrastructures and older systems may not support WireGuard natively, creating challenges for widespread deployment.
  • No Built-in Authentication
    WireGuard itself does not include built-in authentication mechanisms, relying solely on public key cryptography for peer identification.
  • No Built-in Traffic Obfuscation
    WireGuard lacks built-in mechanisms for traffic obfuscation, making it easier for restrictive networks to detect and block WireGuard traffic.

Symantec Endpoint Encryption features and specs

  • Comprehensive Encryption
    Symantec Endpoint Encryption offers both full-disk and removable media encryption, providing a broad range of protection for data stored on different types of devices.
  • Centralized Management
    The solution includes a centralized management console, which simplifies the administration and monitoring of encryption policies across the organization.
  • Industry Compliance
    Supports compliance with various industry standards including GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS, ensuring that data protection practices meet regulatory requirements.
  • Strong Authentication
    Utilizes strong authentication mechanisms like multi-factor authentication (MFA) to enhance the security of encrypted data.
  • User-Friendly
    Offers an intuitive interface and transparent encryption processes, minimizing disruptions to end-users while maintaining strong security.

Possible disadvantages of Symantec Endpoint Encryption

  • Cost
    Symantec Endpoint Encryption can be quite expensive, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises, due to licensing fees and potential additional costs for hardware and software upgrades.
  • Performance Impact
    Encryption and decryption processes can potentially slow down system performance, particularly on older hardware.
  • Complex Deployment
    Initial setup and deployment can be complex, often requiring specialized knowledge and dedicated IT resources to ensure proper configuration.
  • Limited Platform Support
    Certain features or versions may have limited support for non-Windows operating systems, potentially causing issues in mixed-OS environments.
  • Troubleshooting
    Troubleshooting encryption-related issues can be challenging and may require specialized support from Symantec, impacting the speed at which problems are resolved.

WireGuard videos

WireGuard Overview

More videos:

  • Review - What is WireGuard? Should You Use it? Best VPN for WireGuard?
  • Review - OpenVPN vs WireGuard vs IKEv2 vs PPTP - Which is the Best VPN Protocol to use in 2020?

Symantec Endpoint Encryption videos

Symantec Endpoint Encryption -- The logon Process.

More videos:

  • Review - Symantec Endpoint Encryption - User Authenti-Check updating.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WireGuard and Symantec Endpoint Encryption)
VPN
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
6 6%
94% 94
Security & Privacy
51 51%
49% 49
Cloud VPN
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using WireGuard and Symantec Endpoint Encryption. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WireGuard and Symantec Endpoint Encryption

WireGuard Reviews

Best Top 20 OpenVPN Alternatives (Pros and Cons)
Wireguard is a VPN alternative that is under development. Yet it is faster and carefully designed when compared to other similar products.
6 Types of VPN Protocols, Compared: Which is the Best to Use?
In essence, every VPN has to strengthen WireGuard’s wobbly privacy to benefit from its speed and security. That’s why we recommend using WireGuard-based protocols only if they come from reputable VPN providers. NordVPN, for example, fixes WireGuard’s privacy issues with the so-called “double NAT system” (network address translation). This allows them to establish secure...
Source: vpnoverview.com
OpenVPN vs WireGuard: Which protocol is best?
WireGuard was not designed to obfuscate user traffic to this degree, and only supports UDP. This means that a simple, standalone WireGuard connection is easy to detect. However, as WireGuard is so extensible, most VPN providers have added their own obfuscation methods on top. The efficacy of these varies, but we’ve seen services with WireGuard support that even work in...
The 10 Best Open Source VPN Apps
In addition to using the latest encryption techniques, Mullvad is based on some of the VPN protocols in WireGuard and OpenVPN. So, users will be able to decide for themselves which VPN client to opt for. Also, you can find Mullvad on Windows, macOS, and Linux-based systems, as well as Android and iOS. There is no paid version of Mullvad, either, so you need not worry about...
WireGuard vs OpenVPN
WireGuard was designed for speed and security. It was not specifically designed for people like us, who look to their VPN service for both security and privacy. However, in order to give users the benefits of WireGuard, VPN services have come up with WireGuard solutions that add strong privacy protections without sacrificing what makes WireGuard special. Here’s the problem:

Symantec Endpoint Encryption Reviews

We have no reviews of Symantec Endpoint Encryption yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WireGuard seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WireGuard mentions (9)

  • Remote access from work/corporate network
    Wireguard. Wireguard uses UDP only and runs TCP sockets over UDP. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Central reverse-proxy ssh access?
    Look at Wireguard. I know you don't want Yet Another VPN running alongside your IPSec, but it's less VPN and more encrypted point-to-point UDP. You can set it up on any port you wish, including common ports that might be open on an outbound smart firewall not doing deep packet inspection. That way, it can stay out of the way of your existing IPSec deployment. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Official /r/rust "Who's Hiring" thread for job-seekers and job-offerers [Rust 1.69]
    We use Elixir/Erlang for our control plane, and Rust for our data plane, built on the excellent WireGuard® tunneling protocol. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Globally distributed Elixir over Tailscale
    Both products are based off Wireguard which is available for all new linux distributions. https://wireguard.com . I'm not saying OP's solution is wrong, just curious what the advantages are. Other than potentially simpler client setup, what are the advantages of paying for tailscale. With the opensource tailscale, I'm not sure if you get access to an api you can use to look up the hosts. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Whisper: wraps any Go io.ReadWriter in a secure tunnel using Ed25519/X25519
    Noise Protocol Framework (used by Wireguard). Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Symantec Endpoint Encryption mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Symantec Endpoint Encryption yet. Tracking of Symantec Endpoint Encryption recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WireGuard and Symantec Endpoint Encryption, you can also consider the following products

OpenVPN - OpenVPN - The Open Source VPN

ESET Endpoint Security - Powerful multilayered protection for desktops, laptops and smartphones

ProtonVPN - ProtonVPN is a security focused FREE VPN service, developed by CERN and MIT scientists. Use the web anonymously, unblock websites & encrypt your connection.

McAfee Endpoint Security - McAfee Endpoint Security speeds threat de-tection and remediation with antimalware, fast scanning, instant threat detection and updates, and maximized CPU performance.

ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN

LogMeIn Central - LogMeIn Central is a comprehensive endpoint management software that easily helps IT professionals manage and monitor their organization’s endpoint infrastructure.