Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Windows Terminal VS Apache Subversion

Compare Windows Terminal VS Apache Subversion and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Windows Terminal logo Windows Terminal

A new command line interface for Windows machines

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • Windows Terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-10
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Windows Terminal features and specs

  • Unified Interface
    Windows Terminal provides a single interface to access Command Prompt, PowerShell, and Azure Cloud Shell, making it easier to manage multiple command-line tools in one place.
  • Customizable
    The terminal supports a wide range of customization options including themes, colors, and font styles, which allows users to personalize their terminal environment.
  • Tabbed Interface
    The inclusion of tabs allows users to open multiple terminal sessions in a single window, significantly improving multitasking capabilities.
  • Performance
    Built using modern frameworks and technologies, Windows Terminal offers enhanced performance and responsiveness compared to older terminal applications.
  • Regular Updates
    Being an actively developed open-source project, Windows Terminal benefits from regular updates that introduce new features and fix issues.
  • Rich Text and Emoji Support
    The terminal supports rich text, Unicode, and emojis, enhancing the user experience when working with diverse content.
  • Integration with Modern Development Tools
    Seamless integration with modern development tools enhances workflows for developers and IT professionals.

Possible disadvantages of Windows Terminal

  • Learning Curve
    The extensive range of features and customization options can be overwhelming for new users, requiring time to learn and adapt.
  • Resource Usage
    Compared to traditional terminals, Windows Terminal can consume more system resources due to its advanced features and graphical interface.
  • Occasional Instability
    As an evolving project, users might encounter occasional bugs or stability issues, especially with new updates.
  • Limited Backward Compatibility
    Some older scripts and legacy applications might not be fully compatible with Windows Terminal, requiring adjustments.
  • Dependency on Modern Windows Versions
    Windows Terminal requires a modern version of Windows (Windows 10 or later), making it unavailable for users on older systems.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Advanced configuration might require editing JSON files, which can be complex and error-prone for less experienced users.

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

Windows Terminal videos

Windows Terminal Review and Customization Tricks

More videos:

  • Review - The NEW Windows Terminal is Finally Released! - Here's Why It's Awesome
  • Review - The New Windows Terminal ROCKS! Let's customize it!

Apache Subversion videos

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Windows Terminal and Apache Subversion)
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100
Terminal Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Windows Terminal and Apache Subversion. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Windows Terminal seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Windows Terminal mentions (2)

  • Blocking all Calculators with windows server GPOs
    Note that you'd need to block your users from Command Prompt (cmd.exe), PowerShell and the PowerShell ISE (32 and 64 flavours for both) PS> 7*12-9 returns 75, making sure it also blocks access via Windows Terminal (or Windows Terminal is disallowed from installation/execution). Source: about 3 years ago
  • Windows Terminal - What is it, and how can it make you productive with Azure?
    I'm amazed that as I'm writing this, that Windows Terminal is almost two years old now! Windows Terminal was first announced in May 2019 in an early release stage, and later available in preview that Summer through the Microsoft Store. Windows Terminal is a modern app, decoupling the concept of a terminal and a shell, allowing you to spin up the shell that you prefer to use in a friendly, fast and productive... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Apache Subversion mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Subversion yet. Tracking of Apache Subversion recommendations started around May 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Windows Terminal and Apache Subversion, you can also consider the following products

PuTTY - Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Tabby.sh - Tabby is a free and open source SSH, local and Telnet terminal with everything you'll ever need.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.