Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login
W

Wikinfo VS Citizendium

Compare Wikinfo VS Citizendium and see what are their differences

Logseq
Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Wikinfo logo Wikinfo

Wikinfo is a platform over the internet that basically share significant information readily available for access to anyone.

Citizendium logo Citizendium

A wiki for providing free knowledge where authors use their real, verified names.
  • Wikinfo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31
  • Citizendium Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12

Wikinfo videos

No Wikinfo videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Citizendium videos

+ Add

Citizendium

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Wikinfo and Citizendium)

Wikinfo

Citizendium

Content Collaboration
38 38%
Content Collaboration
62% 62
Wikis And Discussion Spaces
34 34%
Wikis And Discussion Spaces
66% 66
Education & Reference
53 53%
Education & Reference
47% 47
Note Taking
24 24%
Note Taking
76% 76

User comments

Share your experience with using Wikinfo and Citizendium. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Citizendium seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Wikinfo mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Wikinfo yet. Tracking of Wikinfo recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Citizendium mentions (3)

  • Toxic comments are associated with reduced volunteer editors on Wikipedia
    > the only conclusion is that the system is flawed. There's a need for a fundamental change in approach There are attempts of creating more "professional" electronic encyclopedia like Citizendium [1] and Scholarpedia [2] but it seems that such tasks are rather hard since Wikipedia solidified its position already, despite flaws [1] - https://en.citizendium.org/ [2] - http://www.scholarpedia.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Kristi Noem hired sculptors to create a Mount Rushmore 'mini-replica' — with Trump 'right next to Abraham Lincoln'
    Larry Sanger was more or less evicted from Wikipedia because his viewpoints and personality conflicted with virtually everyone else, which was, as it still is, made of a broad group of people across the globe. He was with Wikipedia for a year and has criticized the project since he left after his salary was cut. His follow up project, Citizendium is dead. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What the hell happened to the wiki?
    Sanger hasn't built anything that amounted to anything. He's been involved with a bunch of failed projects like Citizendium, most of which were based on the premise that Wikipedia is broken because 1) it allows anyone to contribute and 2) it's not conservative enough. History has proved him wrong. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Wikinfo and Citizendium, you can also consider the following products

Editthis - A free wikifarm project allowing to keep private wiki and build it up through MediaWiki syntax.

Fandom - The entertainment site where fans come first.

Miraheze - Miraheze is a wiki farm (hosts wikis) for free and with no ads, it also provides custom domains...

Wikipedia - Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Investopedia - Investopedia has a lot of information to share with business mind people.

Wikiful - Wikiful is an online platform that makes it easy to build and share a wiki.

Loading...