Wikifur VS Citizendium

According to wikifur.com: 18.4% of respondents self-identified as zoophiles. No questions were asked as to the degree of activity, if any. Source: over 1 year ago

And with sites like Wikifur or Furscience it's all easily available. Source: over 2 years ago

On the contrary. If you have questions about the fandom there are plenty of sources available to you such as Wikifur or Furscience. If you'd like to discuss with furries you can do so on r/RealFurryHours- (where I btw got banned because I said something which a mod misinterpreted as me supporting zoophilia. So much to "furries tolerate zoophiles", I just said something which could be interpreted as support and... Source: almost 3 years ago

> the only conclusion is that the system is flawed. There's a need for a fundamental change in approach There are attempts of creating more "professional" electronic encyclopedia like Citizendium [1] and Scholarpedia [2] but it seems that such tasks are rather hard since Wikipedia solidified its position already, despite flaws [1] - https://en.citizendium.org/ [2] - http://www.scholarpedia.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Larry Sanger was more or less evicted from Wikipedia because his viewpoints and personality conflicted with virtually everyone else, which was, as it still is, made of a broad group of people across the globe. He was with Wikipedia for a year and has criticized the project since he left after his salary was cut. His follow up project, Citizendium is dead. Source: over 2 years ago

Sanger hasn't built anything that amounted to anything. He's been involved with a bunch of failed projects like Citizendium, most of which were based on the premise that Wikipedia is broken because 1) it allows anyone to contribute and 2) it's not conservative enough. History has proved him wrong. Source: almost 3 years ago