Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WhosOnLocation VS Apache Thrift

Compare WhosOnLocation VS Apache Thrift and see what are their differences

WhosOnLocation logo WhosOnLocation

WhosOnLocation is a visitor management system that makes it easy for reception teams and/or non-manned reception areas to know their visitor.

Apache Thrift logo Apache Thrift

An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.
  • WhosOnLocation Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-10
  • Apache Thrift Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-12

WhosOnLocation videos

WhosOnLocation Visitor Management Feature Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Build for Speed - WhosOnLocation - Key person risk

Apache Thrift videos

Apache Thrift

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WhosOnLocation and Apache Thrift)
Visitor Management System
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100
Reception
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers

User comments

Share your experience with using WhosOnLocation and Apache Thrift. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Thrift seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WhosOnLocation mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WhosOnLocation yet. Tracking of WhosOnLocation recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Thrift mentions (12)

  • Delving Deeper: Enriching Microservices with Golang with CloudWeGo
    While gRPC and Apache Thrift have served the microservice architecture well, CloudWeGo's advanced features and performance metrics set it apart as a promising open source solution for the future. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Reddit System Design/Architecture
    Services in general communicate via Thrift (and in some cases HTTP). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Universal type language!
    Protocol Buffers is the most popular one, but there are many others such as Apache Thrift and my own Typical. Source: about 1 year ago
  • You worked on it? Why is it slow then?
    RPC is not strictly OO, but you can think of RPC calls like method calls. In general it will reflect your interface design and doesn't have to be top-down, although a good project usually will look that way. A good contrast to REST where you use POST/PUT/GET/DELETE pattern on resources where as a procedure call could be a lot more flexible and potentially lighter weight. Think of it like defining methods in code... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Java Serialization with Protocol Buffers
    The information can be stored in a database or as files, serialized in a standard format and with a schema agreed with your Data Engineering team. Depending on your information and requirements, it can be as simple as CSV, XML or JSON, or Big Data formats such as Parquet, Avro, ORC, Arrow, or message serialization formats like Protocol Buffers, FlatBuffers, MessagePack, Thrift, or Cap'n Proto. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WhosOnLocation and Apache Thrift, you can also consider the following products

The Receptionist - The Receptionost is a visitor managemnt solution that has visitor logging system to track visitor traffic.

gRPC - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and Service Discovery

TractionGuest - Safe, secure workplace for all.

Eureka - Eureka is a contact center and enterprise performance through speech analytics that immediately reveals insights from automated analysis of communications including calls, chat, email, texts, social media, surveys and more.

Proxyclick - Connect with Confidence

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service