On whatoplay.com, each game has a playscore which is an average based on all reviews on the net such as critic reviews from IGN, gamer reviews from Steam, and reviews directly written on the site. Source: about 1 year ago

Can I add your review to whatoplay.com ? I'll credit you appropriately, (PS, that no dmg run is insane). Source: about 1 year ago

Use whatoplay.com you can filter by year. Source: about 3 years ago

You could also try whatoplay.com - they take at least 3 critic reviews and the average over user ratings from steam, gog.com etc. And then generate an aggregate rating from that. However, niche games will suffer from that (but these could still be great games). Source: about 3 years ago

The new approach this year is a pre-survey ask for help updating the questions, which the community answered. We had multiple Pull Requests on GitHub with valuable additions, which we then rewarded. It all wouldn’t be possible without this year’s partner: we had support from Grant for the Web in 2021, OP Games in 2022, and 2023 was saved by Poki, for which we’re incredibly grateful. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

I personally use three three websites when I wanna goof around for a bit, but there are tons of other sites like it. Https://www.mmobomb.com/browsergames Https://poki.com/ Https://www.crazygames.com/. Source: 6 months ago

Ideally hosted somewhere like itch.io, crazygames.com, newgrounds.com or poki.com. Source: 8 months ago

But if you're doing a larger project, especially if others will be writing the sub-apps (think of something like poki.com where 3rd-party content is hosted) then you probably want a separation, not at the code level, but at the build/runtime level. You see, even with code separation the sub-apps share session/local storage and so can mess with one another. The standard approach here is iframes. Have your player... Source: 12 months ago

I turned into webgames recently. A publisher like poki.com has ads but few and it's a pleasure to play there now. Source: 12 months ago